Assessment drives learning: An unavoidable truth?

The debate around which factors drive medical students' learning is ongoing and controversial. What is the influence of an assessment's weighting on the motivation of students to study the particular subject? One medical school in London is in a unique position to investigate this question. At our institution, the weighting of Anatomy within the overall scheme of assessment has changed twice in recent years, a trend of increased weighting. This enabled a comparative investigation into the effect these changes have had on the students' motivation to learn Anatomy. A five‐point Likert‐scale questionnaire survey was used to evaluate students. A section within a broad survey of Anatomy teaching and learning at our institution was dedicated to the evaluation of the amount of weighting Anatomy received within the assessment structure and the effect this had on students' motivation toward learning the subject. Increasing Anatomy's weighting within the scheme of assessment produced a dramatic increasing trend toward students' motivation to learn Anatomy. The weighting of Anatomy has a profound effect on students' motivation to learn it. Although multifactorial and complex in nature, medical students' self‐reported drive to study a subject is directly influenced by the weighting of the subject in the overall scheme of assessment. Anat Sci Educ 2:199–204, 2009. © 2009 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[2]  P. McKeown,et al.  The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy , 2003, Medical education.

[3]  Douglas P Larsen,et al.  Test‐enhanced learning in medical education , 2008, Medical education.

[4]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  J. McLachlan,et al.  The relationship between assessment and learning , 2006, Medical education.

[6]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Merging views on assessment , 2004, Medical education.

[7]  B. Turney,et al.  Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[8]  Charlotte Ringsted,et al.  The effect of testing on skills learning , 2009, Medical education.

[9]  F. Marton,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning , 2013 .

[10]  J Older,et al.  Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. , 2004, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[11]  R. Leonard,et al.  A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: Gross anatomy , 1996, Clinical anatomy.

[12]  D. Knutson,et al.  Anatomy correlations: introducing clinical skills to improve performance in anatomy. , 2008, Family medicine.

[13]  S. Tibrewal.  The anatomy knowledge of surgical trainees: the trainer's view , 2006 .

[14]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments. , 2004 .

[15]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[16]  C. Zimitat,et al.  Medical students' learning of anatomy: memorisation, understanding and visualisation , 2007, Medical education.

[17]  O. Plaisant,et al.  Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy , 2007, Clinical anatomy.