Dynamic Message Sign Deployment and Diversion Behavior of Travelers on Central Florida Toll Roads

Advanced traveler information systems are particularly helpful in supporting route diversion decisions. The effect of information on diversion behavior on nontolled roads is well documented in the literature. Revealed and stated preference studies traditionally have been conducted to analyze route diversion behavior. However, the effect of realtime traffic information on the behavior of toll road users is unexplored. This study examines the behavior of toll road users in Orlando, Florida. Orlando is serviced by a toll road network where dynamic message signs (DMSs) provide real-time travel time information to travelers. The response of toll road users to information was expected to differ from that of non-toll users. To capture the effects of information, specifically the DMS, a survey was conducted in two phases: predeployment (with only one DMS installed) and postdeployment (after 29 DMSs were installed). A detailed behavioral data set with rigorous modeling was used to investigate the relationship between information and travel decisions in the context of toll road trips. The surveys revealed that higher travel time savings due to diversion, 511 use, and toll payment by cash were associated with a greater propensity to divert in postdeployment. Travelers who experienced abnormal travel times or who reported that DMS helped them during congestion were more likely to divert. The study further showed that toll road users might have more inertia and avoid leaving the toll road than non-toll road users. Implications of the results are discussed.

[1]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling Revealed and Stated Pretrip Travel Response to Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1996 .

[2]  Moshe Levin,et al.  IMPROVING COMMERCIAL RADIO TRAFFIC REPORTS IN THE CHICAGO AREA , 1976 .

[3]  Eiji Hato,et al.  Influence of Traffic Information on Drivers’ Route Choice. Volume 1: Travel Behavior , 1996 .

[4]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling Revealed and Stated En-Route Travel Response to Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1996 .

[5]  Ka-Hung Lai,et al.  SP APPROACH TOWARD DRIVER COMPREHENSION OF MESSAGE FORMATS ON VMS , 2000 .

[6]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  A Combined Traveler Behavior and System Performance Model with ATIS , 1994 .

[7]  M. Haselkorn,et al.  Surveying commuter behavior as a basis for designing motorist information systems , 1989, Conference Record of papers presented at the First Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference (VNIS '89).

[8]  Yasunori Iida,et al.  Panel survey on drivers' route choice behavior under travel time information , 1994, Proceedings of VNIS'94 - 1994 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference.

[9]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Variable message signs and radio traffic information: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behaviour , 1996 .

[10]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Content of Variable Message Signs and On-Line Driver Behavior , 2000 .

[11]  Conrad L Dudek,et al.  SURVEY OF MOTORIST ROUTE-SELECTION CRITERIA (ABRIDGMENT) , 1977 .

[12]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of changeable message signs on traffic diversion , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[13]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUTERS' EN ROUTE DIVERSION BEHAVIOR IN RESPONSE TO DELAY (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1991 .

[14]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Evaluation of the Potential Benefits of Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 2006, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[15]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  USING STATED PREFERENCE DATA FOR STUDYING THE EFFECT OF ADVANCED TRAFFIC INFORMATION ON DRIVERS' ROUTE CHOICE , 1997 .

[16]  David M Levinson,et al.  Effectiveness of VMS Using Empirical Loop Detector Data , 2006 .

[17]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation , 1997 .

[18]  R Dale Huchingson,et al.  DELAY MESSAGES AND DELAY TOLERANCE AT HOUSTON WORK ZONES (ABRIDGMENT) , 1984 .

[19]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Traveller Behavior: Decision-Making in an Unpredictable World , 2004, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[20]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Modeling drivers' diversion from normal routes under ATIS using generalized estimating equations and binomial probit link function , 2004 .

[21]  Conrad L Dudek,et al.  DELAY, TIME SAVED, AND TRAVEL TIME INFORMATION FOR FREEWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT , 1979 .

[22]  Youngbin Yim,et al.  LINK FLOW EVALUATION USING LOOP DETECTOR DATA: TRAVELER RESPONSE TO VARIABLE-MESSAGE SIGNS , 1996 .

[23]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Driver response to variable message sign information in London , 2002 .

[24]  Ian Palmer,et al.  ROUTE CHOICE IN RESPONSE TO VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNS: FACTORS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE. IN: BEHAVIORAL AND NETWORK IMPACTS OF DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[25]  A. Khattak,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Spatial Knowledge and En Route Diversion Behavior in Chicago and San Francisco: Implications for Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 1998 .

[26]  Jeffrey L. Adler,et al.  IN-LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS TO INVESTIGATE DRIVER BEHAVIOR UNDER ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ATIS) , 1993 .