Oral chemotherapeutic agents for colorectal cancer.

A number of novel oral chemotherapeutic agents are entering practice or are under development in the United States. Many of these agents display significant clinical activity against colorectal cancer. Many classes of compounds, including fluoropyrimidine analogs, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitors, topoisomerase inhibitors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, and others, are being developed for oral administration. This manuscript describes the progress of clinical development of these agents and also explores the relative merits and challenges of these approaches. Economic issues, patient preference, and patient selection issues surrounding oral chemotherapy for colorectal cancer will also be discussed.

[1]  C. Bowden,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in advanced cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. J. Johnston,et al.  Eniluracil treatment completely inactivates dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal tumors. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  H. Okuda,et al.  A possible mechanism of eighteen patient deaths caused by interactions of sorivudine, a new antiviral drug, with oral 5-fluorouracil prodrugs. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[5]  Walter A. Korfmacher,et al.  Antitumor activity of SCH 66336, an orally bioavailable tricyclic inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase, in human tumor xenograft models and wap-ras transgenic mice. , 1998, Cancer research.

[6]  B. Reigner,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Ratain,et al.  Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of eniluracil plus fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  C. Verschraegen,et al.  A phase I clinical and pharmacological study of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin, a novel water-insoluble topoisomerase I inhibitor , 1998, Anti-cancer drugs.

[10]  N. Kemeny,et al.  9‐aminocamptothecin by 72‐hour continuous intravenous infusion is Inactive in the treatment of patients with 5‐fluorouracil‐refractory colorectal carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[11]  S. Arbuck,et al.  Phase II trial of 9-aminocamptothecin administered as a 72-hour continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  L. Grochow,et al.  Pharmacokinetic, oral bioavailability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C85, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. Houghton,et al.  Schedule‐dependent Efficacy of Camptothecins in Models of Human Cancer a , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  S. Groshen,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral UFT, a combination of the 5-fluorouracil prodrug tegafur and uracil. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[15]  R. Pazdur,et al.  Phase I trials of uracil‐tegafur (UFT) using 5 and 28 day administration schedules: demonstration of schedule‐dependent toxicities , 1996, Anti-cancer drugs.

[16]  J. Lokich,et al.  Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors‐‐Part one: Model projections for cost based on charges , 1996, Cancer.

[17]  J. Lokich,et al.  Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration‐‐Part two: Use of charges versus reimbursement for cost basis , 1996 .

[18]  T. Aikou,et al.  The expression of thymidine phosphorylase and thrombomodulin in human colorectal carcinomas. , 1995, Cancer letters.

[19]  L. Saltz,et al.  A fixed‐ratio combination of uracil and ftorafur (UFT) with low dose leucovorin. An active oral regimen for advanced colorectal cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[20]  F. Sanchiz,et al.  Tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus folinic acid in advanced rectal cancer. , 1994, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[21]  J. Ajani,et al.  Phase II trial of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: an effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Y. Rustum,et al.  5-Ethynyluracil (776C85): modulation of 5-fluorouracil efficacy and therapeutic index in rats bearing advanced colorectal carcinoma. , 1994, Cancer research.

[23]  T. Spector,et al.  5-Ethynyluracil (776C85): inactivation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in vivo. , 1993, Biochemical pharmacology.

[24]  R. Souhami,et al.  Patient compliance with oral chemotherapy as assessed by a novel electronic technique. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  L. Liu,et al.  Involvement of nucleic acid synthesis in cell killing mechanisms of topoisomerase poisons. , 1990, Cancer research.

[26]  K. Kinoshita,et al.  Acute phenytoin intoxication associated with the antineoplastic agent UFT. , 1990, Fukuoka igaku zasshi = Hukuoka acta medica.

[27]  T. Kamano,et al.  [Clinical results of treatment with the UFT fine granule preparation under cooperative study. Tokyo Cancer Chemotherapy Cooperative Study Group]. , 1987, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[28]  Y. Takiyama,et al.  [Antineoplastic effect of UFT therapy (uracil-FT-207 combination therapy) on experimental pancreatic cancer transplanted in the pancreas and subcutaneous region]. , 1982, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[29]  W. Sadee,et al.  Metabolic activation of ftorafur [R,S-1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil]: the microsomal oxidative pathway. , 1982, Biochemical pharmacology.

[30]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1999 , 1999, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral 9-aminocamptothecin (NSC-603071) , 1998, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[32]  A. Fujioka,et al.  Augmentation of the chemotherapeutic effectiveness of UFT, a combination of tegafur [1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil] with uracil, by oral l-leucovorin. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[33]  E. Espinosa,et al.  UFT modulated with leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: Oncopaz experience. , 1997, Oncology.

[34]  E. Warner,et al.  Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  J. Hardcastle,et al.  Colorectal cancer , 1993, Europe Against Cancer European Commission Series for General Practitioners.

[36]  F. McCormick,et al.  Regulators and effectors of ras proteins. , 1991, Annual review of cell biology.

[37]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .