Evaluation and analysis on positioning performance of BDS/QZSS satellite navigation systems in Asian-Pacific region

Abstract By using the observation data and products of precise obit and clock offset from Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) and GNSS Research Centre, Curtin University in this paper, the positioning performance of BDS/QZSS satellite navigation system has been analyzed and evaluated in aspects of the quantity of visible satellites, DOP value, multipath effect, signal-to-noise ratio, static PPP and kinematic PPP. The analysis results show that compared to BDS single system when the cutoff angle are 30°and 40°, the DOP value of BDS/QZSS combined system has decreased above 20%, and the quantity of visible satellites increased about 16–30% respectively, because of the improved spatial geometric configuration. The magnitude of satellite multipath effect of BDS system shows the trend of MEO > IGSO > GEO, which is consistent with that of QZSS satellite system, as the constellation structure of the two systems is similar. The variation tendencies of signal-to-noise ratio with respect to elevation angle of the two systems are almost the same at all frequencies, showing that at the same elevation angle the signal-to-noise ratio of MEO satellites is higher than that of IGSO satellites, as the higher obit is the lower transmitting power is obtained. For having a specially designed obit, the variation of signal-to-noise ratio of BDS system is more stable. However, the magnitude of signal-to-noise ratio of QZSS system appears the trend of frequency 3 > frequency 2 > frequency 1. The static PPP performance of the BDS/QZSS combination system has been improved more significantly than the BDS single system in E, N and U directions. When the cutoff angle are at 7°, 15° and 30°, the PPP accuracy is increased about 25–34% in U direction, 10–13% and 23–34% in E and N directions respectively. When the elevation angle is large (40°), compared to BDS single system at lower elevation angles (7° and 15°) the PPP accuracy of the BDS/QZSS combination system is improved above 30% in U direction. In kinematic PPP performance, compared to BDS single system, the accuracy, availability and reliability of the BDS/QZSS combination system has been improved too, especially at large elevation angles (30° and 40°), the kinematic PPP accuracy in E and U directions has been improved about 10–50%, and above 50% in U direction. It can be concluded that the combination with QZSS system can improve the positioning accuracy, reliability and stability of BDS system. In the future, with the improvement of the satellite construction of Japan’s QZSS system and the global networking of China’s BDS satellites, the QZSS satellites will contribute greatly to improve the positioning accuracy, reliability, availability and stability of GNSS systems in areas such as cities, mountains, densely-packed buildings and severely covered areas in Asian-Pacific region.

[1]  Jinlong Li,et al.  Progress and performance evaluation of BeiDou global navigation satellite system: Data analysis based on BDS-3 demonstration system , 2018, Science China Earth Sciences.

[2]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Statistical analysis and quality control for GPS fractional cycle bias and integer recovery clock estimation with raw and combined observation models , 2017 .

[3]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Instantaneous GPS/Galileo/QZSS/SBAS Attitude Determination: A Single-Frequency (L1/E1) Robustness Analysis under Constrained Environments , 2014 .

[4]  Harald Schuh,et al.  GAMP: An open-source software of multi-GNSS precise point positioning using undifferenced and uncombined observations , 2018, GPS Solutions.

[5]  Xiaohong Zhang,et al.  The contribution of Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) to precise point positioning , 2017 .

[6]  Jingnan Liu,et al.  Satellite availability and point positioning accuracy evaluation on a global scale for integration of GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[7]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  GPS, Galileo, QZSS and IRNSS differential ISBs: estimation and application , 2017, GPS Solutions.

[8]  C. Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[9]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges , 2017 .

[10]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Array-based satellite phase bias sensing: theory and GPS/BeiDou/QZSS results , 2014 .

[11]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[12]  Nikita P. Zelensky,et al.  Impact of ITRS 2014 realizations on altimeter satellite precise orbit determination , 2018 .

[13]  Wei Li,et al.  Array-aided single-frequency state-space RTK with combined GPS, Galileo, IRNSS, and QZSS L5/E5a observations , 2017 .

[14]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Australia-first high-precision positioning results with new Japanese QZSS regional satellite system , 2018, GPS Solutions.

[15]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[16]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Assessment of precise orbit and clock products for Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS from IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[17]  Robert Odolinski,et al.  Single-frequency, dual-GNSS versus dual-frequency, single-GNSS: a low-cost and high-grade receivers GPS-BDS RTK analysis , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[18]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Assessing the IRNSS L5-signal in combination with GPS, Galileo, and QZSS L5/E5a-signals for positioning and navigation , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[19]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Modeling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[20]  Robert Odolinski,et al.  Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[21]  Horst Müller,et al.  Evaluation of DTRF2014, ITRF2014, and JTRF2014 by Precise Orbit Determination of SLR Satellites , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[23]  Zhang Xiaohong,et al.  Convergence Time and Positioning Accuracy Comparison between BDS and GPS Precise Point Positioning , 2015 .