The application of quantitative data analysis for the assessment of flat panel x-ray detectors in digital radiography as part of a quality assurance programme

For this study a methodology, which is based on IPEM report 32 Part VII guidance, has been developed for measuring image quality metrics like system transfer properties, signal to noise ratio, modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) as part a quality assurance programme for digital detectors used in radiography. We investigate the short and long term consistency of the method, inter-detector variability, and we examine the overall applicability and usefulness in routine quality control (QC) measurements. All measurements were performed at a fixed focus detector distance of 140 cm with 1 mm Cu added filtration and 70 kV. Short and long term consistency of our protocol was assessed with a Philips DigiDiagnost that was equipped with a portable detector (Pixium 5500) and a fixed detector (Pixium 4600). Short term consistency for all metrics assessed was excellent with the standard error between five consecutive measurements to be less than 2%. The long term consistency was also very good with the maximum coefficient of variation (cov) to be about 5% for all parameters assessed. Reproducibility of the method was tested against five groups of identical detectors (GE FlashPad, Samsung, Pixium 4600 and 5500, and Canon CXDI-55C). Maximum cov for the MTF, NNPS and DQE were found to be about 5%, 15% and 8% respectively for all detector groups assessed. Furthermore, we demonstrate that relatively large changes in these quality metrics (>15%) indicate changes in detector performance like image artefacts or miscalibrated detectors. The method described in this paper was found to be repeatable and reproducible. In addition, it was easily applied in routine QC and used to monitor changes in detector performance and compare different x-ray detectors used in radiography.

[1]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  Ian A. Cunningham.  Use of the detective quantum efficiency in a quality assurance program , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital x-ray imaging devices according to the standard IEC 62220-1 , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[7]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Image Science: Principles, Analysis and Evaluation of Photographic-Type Imaging Processes , 1974 .

[8]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Computed Radiography (CR) Systems for Mammography A Comparative Technical Report Edition 2 , 2006 .

[9]  Alistair Mackenzie.  Validation of correction methods for the non-linear response of digital radiography systems. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[11]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  N W Marshall,et al.  Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  M. Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. , 1984, Medical physics.

[16]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[18]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes. , 2013, Medical physics.

[19]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques. , 1992, Medical physics.

[20]  F R Verdun,et al.  Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  N W Marshall,et al.  A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  E. Joseph Billo,et al.  Excel for Scientists and Engineers , 2004 .

[23]  D. Thwaites,et al.  Automated Analysis Software for the Objective Assessment and Optimisation of Radiotherapy Image Quality , 2007 .

[24]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[25]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. , 1984, Medical physics.