Affective Reward and the Adoption of Group Support Systems: Productivity Is Not Always Enough

Research shows that group support systems (GSS) have dramatically increased group productivity. However, researchers in the field discovered that users sometimes find themselves feeling emotionally unfulfilled despite exceptionally good results; users report a loss of the affective reward often associated with a challenging meeting where they struggle and succeed. This lack of engagement has been shown to be a cause of user resistance to adopting GSS technology. Team effectiveness may be reduced over time as users seek less-effective but more-gratifying alternatives. This paper frames affective reward as a function of excitation transfer. It describes the development and validation of an instrument to measure affective reward, and presents the results of the first laboratory investigation of the construct.

[1]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[4]  J Cooper,et al.  Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[6]  J. Singer,et al.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. , 1962 .

[7]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. , 1972 .

[8]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  Techniques Of Attitude Scale Construction , 1958 .

[9]  R. Daft A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[10]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  The Implications of Group Development and History for Group Support System Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[11]  Louis Fried ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE , 1993 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[13]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Organizational Adoption of Microcomputer Technology: The Role of Sector , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  L. Fried,et al.  Advanced information technology use: a survey of multinational corporations , 1993 .

[15]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Technology support for cooperative work: A framework for studying introduction and assimilation in organizations , 1991 .

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument to measure the impact of group support technology on affective reward , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Social loafing in electronic brainstorming: invoking social comparison through technology and facilitation techniques to improve group productivity , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[20]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[21]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An integrated framework for the study of group decision support systems , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[26]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[27]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Belief discrepant behavior and the bogus pipeline: Impression management or arousal attribution , 1984 .

[28]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[29]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[30]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[32]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[33]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[34]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  Building the business case for group support technology , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..