The laboratory control of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis during the early postpartum period after cesarean delivery

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cesarean section is up to 0.6%, and the widespread use of cesarean section draws attention to this group. The dosage and duration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis after delivery is estimated by anamnestic risk-scales; however, the predictive potency for an individual patient’s risk can be low. Laboratory hemostasis assays are expected to solve this problem. The aim of this study was to estimate the potency of tests to reflect the coagulation state of patients receiving LMWH in the early postpartum period. Materials and methods: We conducted an observational study on 97 women undergoing cesarean section. Standard coagulation tests (Fg, APTT, prothrombin, D-dimer), an anti-Xa assay, rotation thromboelastometry and thrombodynamics/thrombodynamics-4D were performed. Coagulation assay parameters were compared in groups formed in the presence or absence of LMWH to estimate the laboratory assays’ sensitivity to anticoagulation. Results: Coagulation assays revealed hypercoagulation after delivery and a tendency toward normalization of coagulation during early postpartum. The thromboprophylaxis results revealed a higher percentage of coagulation parameters within the normal range in the LMWH group. Conclusion: This research is potentially beneficial for the application of thrombodynamics and thrombodynamics-4D in monitoring coagulation among patients with high VTE risk who receive thromboprophylaxis with heparin.

[1]  D. Witt,et al.  Laboratory Monitoring of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Fondaparinux , 2016, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[2]  D. Radojkovic,et al.  Thrombin generation, D-dimer and protein S in uncomplicated pregnancy , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  M. Panteleev,et al.  Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with pregnancy. , 2015, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[4]  R. Zhdanov,et al.  The method of in vivo evaluation of hemostasis: Spatial thrombodynamics , 2015, Hematology.

[5]  A. Orçun,et al.  Establishing reference intervals for D-dimer to trimesters , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[6]  F. Ataullakhanov,et al.  Thromboelastography, thrombin generation test and thrombodynamics reveal hypercoagulability in patients with multiple myeloma , 2015, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[7]  E. Tuddenham,et al.  Thrombin generation assay identifies individual variability in responses to low molecular weight heparin in pregnancy: implications for anticoagulant monitoring , 2015, British journal of haematology.

[8]  A. Khashan,et al.  Gestation‐specific D‐dimer reference ranges: a cross‐sectional study , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  P. Kawalec,et al.  Effectiveness of targeted therapy as monotherapy or combined therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Hematology.

[10]  Peng Shi,et al.  Changes of thrombelastography in patients undergoing elective primary total knee and total hip replacement with low molecular heparin prophylaxis , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[11]  H. Scheepers,et al.  Peri-partum reference ranges for ROTEM(R) thromboelastometry. , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  F. Ataullakhanov,et al.  Laboratory tests for coagulation system monitoring in a patient with β-thalassemia , 2014, International Journal of Hematology.

[13]  F. Ataullakhanov,et al.  Circulating Contact-Pathway-Activating Microparticles Together with Factors IXa and XIa Induce Spontaneous Clotting in Plasma of Hematology and Cardiologic Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  I. Greer,et al.  A population-based study of venous thrombosis in pregnancy in Scotland 1980-2005. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[15]  F. Ataullakhanov,et al.  Thrombin activity propagates in space during blood coagulation as an excitation wave. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[16]  F. Ataullakhanov,et al.  Predicting prothrombotic tendencies in sepsis using spatial clot growth dynamics , 2012, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[17]  Z. Jianping,et al.  Changes in coagulation and hemodynamics during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study of 58 cases , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  H. Brown,et al.  Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Diagnosis, Complications, and Management , 2010, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  M. Laffan,et al.  Monitoring heparin anticoagulation in the acute phase response , 2010, British journal of haematology.

[20]  Shiliang Liu,et al.  Epidemiology of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a population-based study in Canada. , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[21]  A. Levrat,et al.  Coagulation assessment by rotation thrombelastometry in normal pregnancy , 2009, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[22]  M Greaves,et al.  Guidelines on the use and monitoring of heparin , 2006, British journal of haematology.

[23]  M. Morse Establishing a normal range for d‐dimer levels through pregnancy to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis , 2004, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[24]  B. Brenner Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. , 2004, Thrombosis research.

[25]  K. Bremme Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[26]  M. Greaves,et al.  Limitations of the Laboratory Monitoring of Heparin Therapy , 2002, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[27]  P. Hohlfeld,et al.  TAFI antigen and D‐dimer levels during normal pregnancy and at delivery , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[28]  D. Giavarina,et al.  Reference interval of D-dimer in pregnant women. , 2001, Clinical biochemistry.

[29]  A. C. Primavesi ? Thrombotic Risk during Pregnancy: A Population Study , 2000 .

[30]  R. Gherman,et al.  Incidence, clinical characteristics, and timing of objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.