Motor timing and more – additional options using advanced registration and evaluation of tapping data

Abstract Motor coordination in multi-tasking situations is relevant to everyday life, since numerous daily activities require the performance of more than one task simultaneously. Investigations into this topic often use dual-task experiments like bimanual tapping, with different instructions for the right and left hands, such as to tap repetitively with the right index finger at a given frequency and to concurrently execute a single tap in response to a go signal with the left index finger. A basic experimental set-up for tapping consists of only a pace signal generator and ground contact sensors such as micro switches for observation of motor action. Evaluation of the binary on-off signals provided by these switches is quite simple, but the amount of information obtained is also limited. This paper presents a novel experimental design for tapping experiments with high-resolution recording of the complete time course of continuous finger movements. The evaluation procedures required for biomechanical and EMG data are described. The latter are based on sophisticated maximum-likelihood techniques, which is an example of progress in research using advanced biosignal processing.

[1]  B. Repp Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  C D Wickens,et al.  The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003). , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  G. Staude,et al.  Synchronization of periodic movements with external events and interlimb coordination: phase entrainment or phase resetting? * , 2004 .

[5]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Spectral decomposition of variability in synchronization and continuation tapping: comparisons between auditory and visual pacing and feedback conditions. , 2002, Human movement science.

[6]  A Gevargez,et al.  Präzision und Vergleich von CT-, MR- und DL-gesteuerten Interventionen am Beispiel der lumbalen Facetteninfiltration - eine experimentelle Untersuchung - Precision and Comparison of CT-, MRI- and X-ray-guided Interventions in Lumbar Facet Infiltration - an Experimental Study , 2000 .

[7]  G. Aschersleben Temporal Control of Movements in Sensorimotor Synchronization , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Taishin Nomura,et al.  MEG responses during rhythmic finger tapping in humans to phasic stimulation and their interpretation based on neural mechanisms , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  Temporal Control and Coordination: The Multiple Timer Model , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  B H Kantowitz,et al.  Interference in short-term motor memory: interpolated task difficulty, similarity, or activity? , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Effects of arousal and directed attention on hemispheric asymmetry in a finger-tapping dual-task paradigm. , 1989, The International journal of neuroscience.

[12]  A. Semjen,et al.  Timing goals in bimanual coordination , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Andrew Cohen,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillators at Our Fingertips , 2007, Am. Math. Mon..

[15]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[16]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  W. Hall,et al.  The Time-Sense , 1927 .

[18]  Joachim Gross,et al.  How the brain controls repetitive finger movements , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[19]  Knut Drewing,et al.  Reduced Timing Variability during Bimanual Coupling: A Role for Sensory Information , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Keeping with the beat: movement trajectories contribute to movement timing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[22]  Susan Kemper,et al.  The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[23]  H Tsuru,et al.  Reproducibility of tooth tapping rhythm in young and elderly dentate subjects. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[24]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  D. Sternad,et al.  Interactions between rhythmic and discrete components in a bimanual task. , 2003, Motor control.

[26]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Dual-Finger Preferred-Speed Tapping: Effects of Coordination Mode and Anatomical Finger and Limb Pairings. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.