Development of a California Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transport Model with Cargo Flow Analysis

This project further develops the Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) model, configures the model with California-specific data, and uses the configured model in a case study of the possible benefit of shifting freight transportation from trucks to rail. The result is a model that describes the energy and environmental impacts of goods movement through California’s marine, highway, and rail systems. The GIFT research team has employed a geographic information system (GIS)-based model that integrates three transportation network models (road, rail, water), joined by intermodal transfer facilities (ports, railyards, truck terminals) in a single GIS “intermodal network” modified to capture energy and environmental attributes. A case study was performed to explore the difference in emissions under least-travel-time versus least-CO2 routing of goods movements, identifying how emissions savings can be achieved through modal shifts from road to rail. The case study estimates CO2 emissions to be approximately 2.89 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2 attributable to the container traffic of the three major West Coast ports (Los Angeles-Long Beach, Oakland and Seattle) using a least-time scenario (which comprises mostly trucks). The estimation of a total reduction of approximately 1.7 MMT of CO2 occurs through a nationwide modal shift of West Coast port-generated goods movement; within California state air basins, this reduction is near 0.5 MMT CO2. Overall, this research demonstrates how the GIFT model, configured with California-specific data, can be used to improve understanding and decision-making associated with freight transport at regional scales.

[1]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Energy Use and Emissions from Marine Vessels: A Total Fuel Life Cycle Approach , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Dominique Peeters,et al.  Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system , 2004 .

[3]  N. Shinghal,et al.  FREIGHT MODE CHOICE AND ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCES , 2002 .

[4]  P Spaulding,et al.  NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS , 1983 .

[5]  Lee Schipper,et al.  ENERGY USE AND CARBON EMISSIONS FROM FREIGHT IN 10 INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: AN ANALYSIS OF TRENDS FROM 1973 TO 1992 , 1997 .

[6]  M. V. Valkenburg Network Analysis , 1964 .

[7]  John Golias,et al.  Towards the improvement of a combined transport chain performance , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  J. J. Trip,et al.  Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?--A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature , 2004 .

[9]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers , 1999 .

[10]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[12]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  Intermodal Transportation Network Custom Evaluators for Environmental Policy Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  John Golias,et al.  Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals , 2002 .

[14]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion , 2000 .

[15]  D. H. Mellor,et al.  Real time , 1981 .

[16]  Paul Komor Reducing energy use in US freight transport , 1995 .

[17]  Part IV: Appendices , 2005, MUC.

[18]  W. B. Davis,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for freight: trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1993 , 1999 .

[19]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[20]  Felix Ammah-Tagoe,et al.  How Freight Moves: Estimating Mileage and Routes Using an Innovative GIS Tool , 2007 .

[21]  A E Pisarski,et al.  NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS , 2000 .

[22]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  Development of an intermodal network for freight transportation analysis , 2007 .

[23]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  European freight transport and the environment: empirical applications and scenarios , 1997 .

[24]  Francis M. Vanek,et al.  Improving the energy efficiency of freight in the United States through commodity-based analysis: justification and implementation , 2000 .

[25]  Gast Pieter Koopman Long-term challenges for inland transport in the European Union: 1997-2010--consequences for transport fuel economy and use , 1997 .