Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation.

BACKGROUND To compare closed intramedullary nailing with open plate and screw fixation and set the indications for each treatment modality in distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia, 64 consecutive cases of fractures that had been randomly treated with either method were prospectively followed up. METHOD Thirty-four patients were in the group treated with closed intramedullary nailing (Group I) and 30 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with anatomic plates and screws (Group II). They were observed for 2 years, and the end results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The duration of operation was 72 minutes in Group I and 89 minutes in Group II (p = 0.02). The period of time before radiologic union was 18 weeks in Group I and 20 weeks in Group II (p = 0.89). There was one superficial infection in Group I and six superficial infections and one deep infection in Group II (p = 0.03). The average angulation was 2.8 degrees in Group I and 0.9 degrees in Group II (p = 0.01). The ankle dorsiflexion at the final follow-up was 14 degrees in Group I and 7 degrees in Group II (p = 0.001). The Olerud and Molander functional ankle score was 88.5% of normal side in Group I and 88.2% in Group II (p = 0.71). CONCLUSION Our results have shown that locked intramedullary nails have an advantage in the duration of operation, restoration of motion, and reduced wound problems, and anatomic plate and screws can restore alignment better than intramedullary nails. It can be concluded from this study that intramedullary nails are recommended for fractures associated with soft-tissue damage of Tscherne C2 or higher. In other cases, the authors think that either treatment modality can yield expected results.

[1]  C. Olerud,et al.  A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.

[2]  D. Pienkowski,et al.  Modified Tibial Nails for Treating Distal Tibia Fractures , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  R. Gustilo,et al.  JSBS classics. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analyses. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A. Ruiz,et al.  Dia-metaphyseal distal tibial fractures--treatment with a shortened intramedullary nail: a review of 15 cases. , 2000, Injury.

[5]  M. Liebergall,et al.  The unreamed tibial nail in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures. , 1999, Injury.

[6]  T. Limbird,et al.  Operative Treatment of Fractures of the Tibial Plafond. A Randomized, Prospective Study* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  S. Journeaux,et al.  Unreamed intramedullary tibial nailing--fatigue of locking bolts. , 1996, Injury.

[8]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  D. Wiss,et al.  Open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plafond fractures. Variables contributing to poor results and complications. , 1993 .

[10]  M. Börner,et al.  [Results of interlocking nailing of distal tibial fractures]. , 1990, Der Unfallchirurg.

[11]  L. Bone,et al.  Treatment of tibial fractures by reaming and intramedullary nailing. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  K. Benedetto,et al.  [Long-term results after conservative and surgical treatment of fractures of the distal end of the tibia]. , 1986, Aktuelle Traumatologie.

[13]  K. Larsson,et al.  Plate fixation versus conservative treatment of tibial shaft fractures. A randomized trial. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.