Background: A previous study examined the communication process within the emergency department (ED) and identified a complex process with many opportunities for breakdown and error. In this paper the first two interventions in a series of studies to improve this highly vulnerable communication process are described. Aim: To improve the reliability of two steps of the communication process identified as having a high probability of failure: (1) transfer of information between the ambulance crew and the emergency staff; and (2) preparation of written documentation following patient assessment. Methods: Quantitative assessments of the reliability of communication were carried out to establish the extent of problems highlighted during the failures modes and effects analysis (FMEA) previously described. Improvements to the process were then introduced, and the process re-examined to assess the impact of the changes and reduction of the likelihood and severity of the failure mode. Results: The studies demonstrated very high levels of communication failure, particularly in transfer of written information from the ambulance crew. Countermeasures were introduced which resulted in a substantial reduction in missing and incorrect information. In addition, there was a threefold improvement in the number of correct clinical documents used by doctors in the resuscitation room. Conclusion: Observational study and audit revealed the extent of process failures identified in the initial FMEA process. With the introduction of simple changes to the communication system, a marked improvement in the availability and quality of pertinent clinical information was achieved with considerable implications for the timeliness and quality of care provided to patients.
[1]
Rory Wolfe,et al.
Complaints from emergency department patients largely result from treatment and communication problems.
,
2002,
Emergency medicine.
[2]
S. Thakore,et al.
A survey of the perceived quality of patient handover by ambulance staff in the resuscitation room
,
2001,
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.
[3]
A. O’Connor,et al.
Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department
,
2002,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[4]
E. Redfern,et al.
Identifying vulnerabilities in communication in the emergency department
,
2009,
Emergency Medicine Journal.
[5]
Rollin J Fairbanks,et al.
Emergency department communication links and patterns.
,
2007,
Annals of emergency medicine.
[6]
A. Stiell,et al.
Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes.
,
2003,
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.