Conceptualism and the New Myth of the Given

The motivation for McDowell’s conceptualism is an epistemological consideration. McDowell believes conceptualism would guarantee experience a justificatory role in our belief system and we can then avoid the Myth of the Given without falling into coherentism. Conceptualism thus claims an epistemological advantage over nonconceptualism. The epistemological advantage of conceptualism is not to be denied. But both Sellars and McDowell insist experience is not belief. This makes it impossible for experience to justify empirical knowledge, for the simple reason that what is not a belief cannot justify a belief. Nondoxastic experience, though conceptual, is still a Given. And what conceptualism gives us can only be a New Myth of the Given.

[1]  G. McCulloch,et al.  The Varieties of Reference. , 1984 .

[2]  J. Mcdowell Lecture I: Sellars on Perceptual Experience , 1998 .

[3]  R. Descartes,et al.  The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Index , 1985 .

[4]  Wilfrid S. Sellars Empiricism and the philosophy of mind , 1997 .

[5]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[6]  J. Mcdowell,et al.  Mind and World , 1994 .

[7]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[8]  Hannah Ginsborg,et al.  Reasons for Belief , 2006 .

[9]  K. Bach Varieties of Reference , 1994 .

[10]  Michael Williams Science and Sensibility: McDowell and Sellars on Perceptual Experience , 2006 .

[11]  Ernest Sosa,et al.  Epistemology : an anthology , 2000 .

[12]  D. Davidson A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge , 2001 .

[13]  Donald Davidson,et al.  The Myth of the Subjective , 2001 .

[14]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Knowledge and Its Limits , 2000 .

[15]  B. Stroud SENSE-EXPERIENCE AND THE GROUNDING OF THOUGHT , 2002 .

[16]  P. Strawson Reply to John McDowell , 1998 .

[17]  John McDowell,et al.  Knowledge and the Internal , 1995, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality.

[18]  John McDowell,et al.  Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge , 2001, Studies in the philosophy of logic and knowledge.

[19]  L. E. Hahn The philosophy of Donald Davidson , 1999 .

[20]  H. Feigl,et al.  Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science , 1956 .

[21]  John McDowell,et al.  Knowledge and the Internal Revisited , 2002 .