Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate electronic diaries as a tool for investigating associations between physical symptoms and psychological variables. METHODS A qualitative systematic review of electronic diary studies in pain and symptoms research was performed. RESULTS Studies of electronic diary use report good acceptability and accuracy of data recording. A descriptive classification of the findings of electronic diary studies yielded five categories: experience, recording data when symptoms were present; interaction, testing the relationship between variables at different levels; sequential, observing associations at different time lags; process, recording possible mediating constructs such as catastrophization and self-efficacy; and intervention, recording during treatment to identify trends. Most data from diary studies suggest relatively weak associations between variables. CONCLUSION Electronic diaries are a potentially valuable tool for psychosomatic research. We suggest further possibilities for their use.

[1]  R. Dahlhaus,et al.  Using Interaction Graphs for Analysing the Therapy Process , 2005, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[2]  C. Dancey,et al.  The relationship between daily stress and symptoms of irritable bowel: a time-series approach. , 1998, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[3]  J. Olesen,et al.  Premonitory symptoms in migraine , 2003, Neurology.

[4]  Yoshiharu Yamamoto,et al.  Symptom Profile of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in Actual Life , 2005, Psychosomatic medicine.

[5]  Nathaniel P. Katz,et al.  Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers , 2002, PAIN.

[6]  G. Cumming,et al.  Frequent measurement of chronic pain: an electronic diary and empirical findings , 1995, Pain.

[7]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain , 2004, Pain.

[8]  J. Turner,et al.  Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: is reactivity a problem? , 2005, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[9]  Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: An analysis from ecological momentary assessment. , 2002 .

[10]  A. Stone,et al.  Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[11]  G. Affleck,et al.  Sequential daily relations of sleep, pain intensity, and attention to pain among women with fibromyalgia , 1996, Pain.

[12]  J. Vlaeyen,et al.  Electronic diary assessment of pain-related fear, attention to pain, and pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients , 2004, Pain.

[13]  J. Bensing,et al.  Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain , 2000, PAIN®.

[14]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  H Tennen,et al.  Women's pursuit of personal goals in daily life with fibromyalgia: a value-expectancy analysis. , 2001, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  L. Rips,et al.  Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. , 1987, Science.

[17]  G. Affleck,et al.  Examinations of chronic pain and affect relationships: applications of a dynamic model of affect. , 2001, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  J. Turner,et al.  Reasons for missing interviews in the daily electronic assessment of pain, mood, and stress , 2004, Pain.

[19]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Mood and somatic symptoms. , 1987, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[20]  A. Stone,et al.  Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  R. Zuwallack,et al.  Mood States Associated With Transitory Changes in Asthma Symptoms and Peak Expiratory Flow , 2000, Psychosomatic medicine.

[22]  J. Gaertner,et al.  Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study. , 2004, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[23]  Joseph E. Schwartz,et al.  Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction , 2003, Pain.

[24]  J. Turner,et al.  Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for temporomandibular disorder pain: Effects on daily electronic outcome and process measures , 2005, Pain.

[25]  C. Lumsden,et al.  Portable mood mapping: the validity and reliability of analog scale displays for mood assessment via hand-held computer , 2003, Psychiatry Research.

[26]  David A. Williams,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of physical activity and symptoms in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  High-Density Assessment of the Ihs Classification Criteria for Migraine Without Aura: A Prospective Study , 1999, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[28]  Christopher Eccleston,et al.  Acceptance of the unpleasant reality of chronic pain: effects upon attention to pain and engagement with daily activities , 2004, Pain.

[29]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  An Electronic Menstrual Cycle Calendar: Comparison of Data Quality With a Paper Version , 2000, Menopause.

[30]  J. Turner,et al.  Pain-related catastrophizing: a daily process study , 2004, Pain.

[31]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient non-compliance with paper diaries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  F. Blake,et al.  Chronic pelvic pain: the assessment as therapy. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[33]  David P. Martin,et al.  An Analysis of the Relationship Between Activity and Pain in Chronic and Acute Low Back Pain , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[34]  Ralph Mösges,et al.  The use of handheld computers in clinical trials. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[35]  Ingela Wiklund,et al.  Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture. , 2004, Controlled clinical trials.

[36]  A. Stone,et al.  Associations among pain intensity, sensory characteristics, affective qualities, and activity limitations in patients with chronic pain: a momentary, within-person perspective. , 2004, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[37]  S. Armeli,et al.  Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: a preface for the perplexed. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[38]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  It's a function of time: A review of the process approach to behavioral medicine research , 1998, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[39]  R. Jamison,et al.  Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study , 2001, Pain.

[40]  David A. Williams,et al.  Pain Assessment in Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Consideration of Methods for Clinical Trials , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[41]  P. Quinn,et al.  Assessment of an electronic daily diary in patients with overactive bladder , 2003, BJU international.

[42]  M. Litt,et al.  Momentary mood and coping processes in TMD pain. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[43]  Mikael Palmblad,et al.  Electronic diaries and questionnaires: Designing user interfaces that are easy for all patients to use , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[44]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[45]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  P. Miller,et al.  Psycho-social factors in osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1978 .