Problem Representations in Multitasking : a Cognitive Bottleneck ?

Most multitasking models make use of executive processes to assign resources to tasks (Kieras et al., 2000). An alternative is to have no executive, but constrain individual processes so that they share resources in a plausible way. Salvucci and Taatgen (under revision) in their theory of threaded cognition have shown how peripheral resources and declarative memory are shared between processes without an executive. In this paper we will extend this work by showing how two tasks share a resource to store the problem representation in a dual-task paradigm where either task sometimes needs a problem representation and sometimes not. Threaded cognition predicts extra interference when both tasks need a problem representation, which is what we found in the experiment.

[1]  LiuYili,et al.  Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP) , 2006 .

[2]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[3]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[5]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[6]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[7]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Yili Liu,et al.  Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP): A computational architecture for multitask performance in human-machine systems , 2006, TCHI.

[9]  T. Shallice,et al.  CONTENTION SCHEDULING AND THE CONTROL OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[10]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[11]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Learning when to switch tasks in a dynamic multitasking environment , 2006 .

[12]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[14]  Christopher D Wickens,et al.  Processing Resources in Attention, Dual Task Performance, and Workload Assessment. , 1981 .

[15]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Modeling Parallelization and Flexibility Improvements in Skill Acquisition: From Dual Tasks to Complex Dynamic Skills , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[17]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[18]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[19]  K. J. Craik.  Theory of the human operator in control systems; man as an element in a control system. , 1948, British Journal of Psychology General Section.

[20]  Dario D. Salvucci.  A Multitasking General Executive for Compound Continuous Tasks , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Kieras,et al.  Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? , 2000 .