Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of chromatic aberrations in pseudophakic eyes with various types of intraocular lenses (IOLs). PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 51 eyes of 33 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The eyes were divided into 3 groups according to the material from which their IOL was made: group 1, polymethyl methacrylate; group 2, silicone; and group 3, an acrylate/methacrylate copolymer. Ten normal phakic control eyes (group 4) underwent the same examination. Best-corrected distance visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured under white light and monochromatic light with wavelengths of 470 nm, 549 nm, and 630 nm, with the best correction under white light. RESULTS There were no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under the 549-nm monochromatic light in any group. However, under both white multichromatic light and 470- and 630-nm monochromatic light, the mean contrast sensitivity in group 3 tended to be lower, sometimes significantly, than in the other IOL groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that longitudinal chromatic aberrations of some IOLs may degrade the quality of the retinal image. Attention must be paid to the detailed optical performance of IOL materials to achieve good visual function.

[1]  L J Bour.  MTF of the defocused optical system of the human eye for incoherent monochromatic light. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  A Bradley,et al.  Effect of ocular chromatic aberration on monocular visual performance. , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Chapter 1 The retinal image in the human eye , 1983 .

[4]  A Bradley,et al.  Achromatizing the human eye. , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  M. Campbell,et al.  The optical transverse chromatic aberration on the fovea of the human eye , 1990, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Bradley,et al.  Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration , 1990, Vision Research.

[7]  Hideo Kusaka,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of Apparent Reduction of Chromatic Blur Depending on Luminance Signals , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  AGE VARIATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1979, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  A. van Meeteren,et al.  Calculations on the Optical Modulation Transfer Function of the Human Eye for White Light , 1974 .

[10]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Chromatic aberration and ocular focus: Fincham revisited , 1993, Vision Research.

[11]  A Bradley.  Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture 1991: perceptual manifestations of imperfect optics in the human eye: attempts to correct for ocular chromatic aberration. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  P B Kruger,et al.  Accommodation and chromatic aberration: effect of spatial frequency , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Stimuli for accommodation: Blur, chromatic aberration and size , 1986, Vision Research.

[14]  L. Thibos.  Calculation of the influence of lateral chromatic aberration on image quality across the visual field. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of chromatic aberration on visual acuity , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  A Bradley,et al.  Relation between the Chromatic Difference of Refraction and the Chromatic Difference of Magnification for the Reduced Eye , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.