Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Townsend,et al. The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[2] Gordon H. Bower,et al. Semantic category effects in visual word search , 1976 .
[3] James T. Townsend,et al. A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .
[4] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[5] J. Townsend. SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .
[6] H Pashler,et al. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[7] Melissa R. Beck,et al. Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search , 2006 .
[8] J. Palmer,et al. Measuring the effect of multiple eye fixations on memory for visual attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] Allen Allport,et al. Visual attention , 1989 .
[10] R. Ratcliff,et al. Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.
[11] Ervin R. Hafter,et al. A role for memory in divided attention between two independent stimuli , 1998 .
[12] S. Sternberg. Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.
[13] K. Dobkins,et al. Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing , 2001, Vision Research.
[14] William Prinzmetal,et al. Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search , 1983 .
[15] Alan R. Palmer,et al. Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing , 1998 .
[16] J. Palmer. Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .
[17] U. Neisser. VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.
[18] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] U. Neisser. Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .
[20] J. Townsend,et al. Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .
[21] D. Balota,et al. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.
[22] C. Eriksen,et al. Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[23] R W Remington,et al. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] W. P. Tanner. PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[25] W Prinzmetal,et al. Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] Donald L. Fisher,et al. Central capacity limits in consistent mapping, visual search tasks: Four channels or more? , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[27] H. Egeth,et al. Capacity limitations in visual word processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] D. Broadbent. Perception and communication , 1958 .
[29] B. Julesz,et al. Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.
[30] R. Schweickert,et al. Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.
[31] Songmei Han,et al. Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[32] R. Nosofsky,et al. Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Evan F. Risko,et al. Basic processes in reading: Is visual word recognition obligatory? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[34] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[35] Charles Folk,et al. Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. , 1989 .
[36] Soledad Ballesteros,et al. Object Perception : Structure and Process , 2013 .
[37] H. Basford,et al. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005 .
[38] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[39] James T. Townsend,et al. The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .
[40] G Sperling,et al. The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search. , 1978, Science.
[41] H. Pashler. Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[42] Richard Schweickert,et al. A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .
[43] Patrick Monnier,et al. Set-size and chromatic uncertainty in an accuracy visual search task , 2001, Vision Research.
[44] D. Kahneman,et al. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[45] R. Schweickert. Separable effects of factors on activation functions in discrete and continuous models: d' and evoked potentials. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.
[46] B. Dosher,et al. Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .
[47] Philip L. Smith,et al. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.
[48] W. Geisler,et al. Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.
[49] R. Proctor,et al. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[50] J. C. Johnston,et al. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[51] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[52] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[53] Melissa R. Beck,et al. Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[54] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] M. S. Mayzner,et al. Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .
[56] John Palmer,et al. Imperfect, Unlimited-Capacity, Parallel Search Yields Large Set-Size Effects , 1995 .
[57] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[58] J. A. Kleiss,et al. Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] A. Kingstone,et al. Cued Shifts of Attention and Memory Encoding in Partial Report: A Dual-Task Approach , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[60] H Pashler,et al. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] J. Duncan. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.
[62] K. Forster,et al. Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.
[63] R. Rosenholtz. Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[64] Preeti Verghese,et al. Comparing integration rules in visual search. , 2002, Journal of vision.
[65] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[66] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[67] R. Shiffrin,et al. Can attention be allocated to sensory modalities? , 1974 .
[68] H. Pashler,et al. Moray Revisited: High-Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[69] Thomas H Carr,et al. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[70] Thomas L. Thornton,et al. Parallel and serial processes in visual search. , 2007, Psychological review.
[71] James T. Townsend,et al. Comparing Parallel and Serial Models : Theory and Implementation , 2009 .
[72] H. Pashler. The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .
[73] G D Logan,et al. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[74] J. Palmer. Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.
[75] H. Pashler,et al. Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search , 2005, Cognition.
[76] R. Shiffrin,et al. Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.
[77] H Pashler,et al. Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[78] H. Egeth,et al. Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .
[79] Max Coltheart. The psychology of reading , 1987 .
[80] Jeff Miller,et al. Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[81] James T Townsend,et al. Consequences of Base Time for Redundant Signals Experiments. , 2007, Journal of mathematical psychology.
[82] J. Townsend. Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .
[83] James T. Townsend. Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior , 1981 .
[84] G. T. Gardner. Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception , 1973 .
[85] L. Kaufman,et al. Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .
[86] J. Palmer. Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[87] H. Knapp. Attentional capacity limitations on the identification of alphanumeric characters, English words, and American Sign Language signs , 2010 .
[88] A. Bonnel,et al. Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[89] Terry Shikano,et al. Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features , 2003, Vision Research.
[90] James T. Townsend,et al. Issues and Models Concerning the Processing of a Finite Number of Inputs 1 , 2021, Human Information Processing.
[91] John Palmer,et al. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[92] Gordon D. Logan,et al. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001 .
[93] M. Shadlen,et al. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[94] J F Stein,et al. Does Attention Modulate the Perception of Luminance Changes? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[95] A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al. Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel selfterminating process in simple visual search tasks , 1975 .