Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

In perception, divided attention refers to conditions in which multiple stimuli are relevant to an observer. To measure the effect of divided attention in terms of perceptual capacity, we introduce an extension of the simultaneous-sequential paradigm. The extension makes predictions for fixed-capacity models as well as for unlimited-capacity models. We apply this paradigm to two example tasks, contrast discrimination and word categorization, and find dramatically different effects of divided attention. Contrast discrimination has unlimited capacity, consistent with independent, parallel processing. Word categorization has a nearly fixed capacity, consistent with either serial processing or fixed-capacity, parallel processing. We argue that these measures of perceptual capacity rely on relatively few assumptions compared to most alternative measures.

[1]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Semantic category effects in visual word search , 1976 .

[3]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[6]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search , 2006 .

[8]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of multiple eye fixations on memory for visual attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[10]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[11]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  A role for memory in divided attention between two independent stimuli , 1998 .

[12]  S. Sternberg Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[13]  K. Dobkins,et al.  Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search , 1983 .

[15]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing , 1998 .

[16]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[17]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[18]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .

[20]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[21]  D. Balota,et al.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Central capacity limits in consistent mapping, visual search tasks: Four channels or more? , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Capacity limitations in visual word processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[29]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[30]  R. Schweickert,et al.  Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Songmei Han,et al.  Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Basic processes in reading: Is visual word recognition obligatory? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[35]  Charles Folk,et al.  Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. , 1989 .

[36]  Soledad Ballesteros,et al.  Object Perception : Structure and Process , 2013 .

[37]  H. Basford,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005 .

[38]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[39]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[40]  G Sperling,et al.  The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search. , 1978, Science.

[41]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[43]  Patrick Monnier,et al.  Set-size and chromatic uncertainty in an accuracy visual search task , 2001, Vision Research.

[44]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[45]  R. Schweickert Separable effects of factors on activation functions in discrete and continuous models: d' and evoked potentials. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[47]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[48]  W. Geisler,et al.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.

[49]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[56]  John Palmer,et al.  Imperfect, Unlimited-Capacity, Parallel Search Yields Large Set-Size Effects , 1995 .

[57]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[58]  J. A. Kleiss,et al.  Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Cued Shifts of Attention and Memory Encoding in Partial Report: A Dual-Task Approach , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  H Pashler,et al.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[62]  K. Forster,et al.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.

[63]  R. Rosenholtz Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Comparing integration rules in visual search. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[65]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[67]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Can attention be allocated to sensory modalities? , 1974 .

[68]  H. Pashler,et al.  Moray Revisited: High-Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[69]  Thomas H Carr,et al.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[70]  Thomas L. Thornton,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in visual search. , 2007, Psychological review.

[71]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Comparing Parallel and Serial Models : Theory and Implementation , 2009 .

[72]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[73]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[75]  H. Pashler,et al.  Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search , 2005, Cognition.

[76]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[77]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[79]  Max Coltheart The psychology of reading , 1987 .

[80]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  James T Townsend,et al.  Consequences of Base Time for Redundant Signals Experiments. , 2007, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[82]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[83]  James T. Townsend Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior , 1981 .

[84]  G. T. Gardner Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception , 1973 .

[85]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[86]  J. Palmer Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[87]  H. Knapp Attentional capacity limitations on the identification of alphanumeric characters, English words, and American Sign Language signs , 2010 .

[88]  A. Bonnel,et al.  Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[89]  Terry Shikano,et al.  Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features , 2003, Vision Research.

[90]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Issues and Models Concerning the Processing of a Finite Number of Inputs 1 , 2021, Human Information Processing.

[91]  John Palmer,et al.  Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[92]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001 .

[93]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[94]  J F Stein,et al.  Does Attention Modulate the Perception of Luminance Changes? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[95]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel selfterminating process in simple visual search tasks , 1975 .