Paradox, Promise and Public Pedagogy: Implications of the Federal Government’s Digital Education Revolution

The use of digital technology in the classroom is a significant issue for teachers as they are under increasing pressure to teach in technologically mediated ways. This 'digital turn' in education has culminated in the Australian federal government's Digital Education Revolution, which represents a multi-billion dollar commitment to putting computers in schools and the implementation of technological pedagogical practice. This paper focuses on the confluence between globalised economic process, the Digital Education Revolution, and the discourse of the digital native; and describes the way in which students' use of digital technologies is identity forming. I examine the Digital Education Revolution policy and related discourse in order to sketch out some of the educational implications. Drawing upon Giroux's (2004) notion of 'public pedagogy' I argue that using digital technologies could potentially open up an educative space to allow students to author their own digital identity. While the Digital Education Revolution is a product of the influence of globalisation upon education, it, nonetheless, contains contradictory prohibitions and possibilities that can be utilised to take the use of digital technology beyond that of preparing students for work in a globalised information economy.

[1]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[2]  Taylor C. Boas,et al.  Will the Digital Revolution Revolutionize Development? Drawing Together the Debate , 2005 .

[3]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Digital Citizenship , 2004 .

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Iain A. Boal,et al.  Resisting the virtual life : the culture and politics of information , 1995 .

[6]  Jen Ross,et al.  The 'digital native' and 'digital immigrant': a dangerous opposition , 2007 .

[7]  M. Prensky Listen to the Natives. , 2006 .

[8]  Colin Baskin,et al.  ICT integration in schools: Where are we now and what comes next? , 2006 .

[9]  Sheila Zimic,et al.  Digital Culture & Education (dce) Please Scroll down for Article Not so 'techno-savvy': Challenging the Stereotypical Images of the 'net Generation' , 2009 .

[10]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  S. Holloway,et al.  Cyberkids? Exploring Children’s Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds , 2002 .

[12]  Keri Facer,et al.  Beyond the Myth of the 'Cyberkid': Young People at the Margins of the Information Revolution , 2001 .

[13]  M. Prensky The Emerging Online Life of the Digital Native , 2004 .

[14]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[15]  Kerry M. Mallan,et al.  Look at me! Look at me! Self-representation and self-exposure through online networks , 2009 .

[16]  Veronica Goerke,et al.  Australian undergraduates' use and ownership of emerging technologies: implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation , 2007 .

[17]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[19]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Digital Divide or Digital Opportunity? The Role of Technology in Overcoming Social Exclusion in U.S. Education , 2001 .

[20]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants: Myth or Reality? , 2009 .

[21]  A. Margaryan,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality?: Students’ use of technologies for learning , 2008 .

[22]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers , 2005 .

[23]  A. Kennedy The professional development of teachers , 2008 .

[24]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[25]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  The Three P's of Pedagogy for the Networked Society: Personalization, Participation, and Productivity. , 2008 .

[26]  R. Buchanan,et al.  Globalisation and social justice: the exploitation of the digital native , 2010 .

[27]  Henry A. Giroux Cultural Studies and the Politics of Public Pedagogy: Making the Political More Pedagogical , 2004 .

[28]  GeeJames Paul What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2003 .

[29]  Kathryn P. Moyle What does 'public school education' in Australia mean in the 21st century , 2008 .

[30]  E. Helsper Digital natives and ostrich tactics?: the possible implications of labelling young people as digital experts , 2008 .

[31]  R. Laura,et al.  The technologisation of education: philosophical reflections on being too plugged in , 2009 .

[32]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[33]  D. Valero Global Crises, Social Justice and Education , 2012 .

[34]  T. Harvey,et al.  Professional Development for Teachers , 1994 .

[35]  Sharn Donnison,et al.  Unpacking the Millennials: A Cautionary Tale for Teacher Education , 2007 .