Attitudes and beliefs of emergency physicians on lab tests utilization in clinical practice. A multicenter survey

It is commonly perceived that the main obstacle for an effective partnership between Emergency Medicine (EM) and Laboratory Medicine (LM) is the lack of reciprocal knowledge and understanding. A further aspect is a partial comprehension of clinical significance and implications of some tests. The real scenario of attitudes and beliefs of Emergency Physicians (EPs) on lab tests utilization in clinical practice remains largely unclear. Therefore, this original study was designed to explore this field of medical knowledge, by using a survey on attitudes and beliefs in laboratory diagnostics which was disseminated among many Italian EPs. A questionnaire containing 20 different items/statements was designed and then disseminated either directly, or in a digital format. Overall, 183 questionnaires were compiled and collected. The results of this nationwide survey seem to confirm the existence of a suboptimal knowledge of both clinical and economic impact of urgent laboratory tests by Italian EPs. An unsatisfactory relationship between EPs and laboratory professionals seems also to emerge. Several EPs attribute this to Shortage of time to think (18.6%), followed by Fair of medical-legal litigation (13.6%). On the other hand, interestingly, it also emerged that some Italian hospitals still include obsolete o redundant tests in panels of urgent laboratory analyses, potentially misleading for the diagnostic reasoning in the Emergency Department (ED). In conclusion, the virtuous circle between EM and LM should be further reinforced for optimizing clinical pathways in Italian EDs, improving clinical outcomes and reducing unnecessary expenditures. A major agreement between laboratory and emergency professionals

[1]  E. Tekin,et al.  Defensive Medicine in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study from the Perspective of Emergency Medical Specialists , 2019 .

[2]  G. Lippi,et al.  Project Management in Laboratory Medicine , 2019, Journal of medical biochemistry.

[3]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Recent Advances in Mainstream Hemostasis Diagnostics and Coagulation Testing , 2019, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[4]  G. Lippi.  The Irreplaceable Value of Laboratory Diagnostics: Four Recent Tests that have Revolutionized Clinical Practice , 2019, EJIFCC.

[5]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Weighting healthcare efficiency against available resources: value is the goal , 2018, Diagnosis.

[6]  M. Hallworth.  That ‘70%’ claim again … , 2018, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[7]  G. Lippi,et al.  Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care-Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology consensus recommendations for clinical use of sepsis biomarkers in the emergency department , 2017 .

[8]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Eliminating Creatine Kinase–Myocardial Band Testing in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Value-Based Quality Improvement , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[9]  G. Lippi,et al.  From laboratory instrumentation to physician’s brain calibration: the next frontier for improving diagnostic accuracy? , 2017 .

[10]  G. Lippi,et al.  Laboratory testing in the emergency department: an Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC) consensus report , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  G. Lippi,et al.  Inappropriateness in laboratory medicine: an elephant in the room? , 2017, Annals of translational medicine.

[12]  G. Lippi,et al.  The risks of defensive (emergency) medicine. The laboratory perspective , 2016 .

[13]  G. Cervellin,et al.  Defensive medicine in the emergency department. The clinicians’ perspective , 2016 .

[14]  G. Lippi,et al.  D-dimer testing for suspected venous thromboembolism in the emergency department. Consensus document of AcEMC, CISMEL, SIBioC, and SIMeL , 2014, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[15]  G. Lippi,et al.  Stat testing utilization in clinical laboratories. National survey of Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (SIBioC) , 2014, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[16]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The ten commandments of laboratory testing for emergency physicians , 2014, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[17]  G. Lippi,et al.  False myths and legends in laboratory diagnostics , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[18]  G. Lippi,et al.  Biomarker research and leading causes of death worldwide: a rather feeble relationship , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[19]  Maria Salinas,et al.  Differences in laboratory requesting patterns in emergency department in Spain , 2013, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[20]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[21]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories , 2011, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[22]  L. Sokoll,et al.  Antiquated tests within the clinical pathology laboratory. , 2010, The American journal of managed care.

[23]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  The power of negative thinking. , 2008, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[24]  E. Hardin.  Emergency medicine and the laboratory. , 1996, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[25]  G. Lippi,et al.  Driving the route of laboratory medicine: a manifesto for the future , 2019, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[26]  Nora Nikolac,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.