Assessing the Impact of Closure Type on Wine Ratings and Mood

We report on a preliminary study designed to assess the impact of the sound of the closure on the taste of wine. Given that people hold certain beliefs around the taste/quality of wines presented in bottles having different closure types, we expected that the sound of opening might influence people’s wine ratings. In particular, if participants hear a cork being pulled vs. the sound of a screw-cap bottle being opened then these two sounds will likely set different expectations that may then affect people’s judgment of the taste/quality of the wine that they are rating. In order to test this hypothesis, 140 people based in the UK (and of varying degrees of wine expertise) rated two wine samples along four scales, three relating to the wine and one relating to celebratory mood. The results demonstrated that the sound of a bottle being opened did indeed impact ratings. In particular, the quality of the wine was rated as higher, its appropriateness for a celebratory occasion, and the celebratory mood of the participant was also higher following the sound of the cork pop. These results add to the literature demonstrating that the sounds of opening/preparation of food and beverage products can exert a significant influence over the sensory and hedonic aspects of people’s subsequent tasting experience.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Touch-flavor transference: Assessing the effect of packaging weight on gustatory evaluations, desire for food and beverages, and willingness to pay , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  Bettina König,et al.  Sensory expectations generated by colours of red wine labels , 2017 .

[3]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Bottled vs. Canned Beer: Do They Really Taste Different? , 2016 .

[4]  Charles Spence,et al.  Sensory expectations elicited by the sounds of opening the packaging and pouring a beverage , 2015, Flavour.

[5]  Charles Spence,et al.  Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound , 2015, Flavour.

[6]  Charles Spence,et al.  Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts , 2015 .

[7]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  The weight of the bottle as a possible extrinsic cue with which to estimate the price (and quality) of the wine? Observed correlations , 2012 .

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer , 2011 .

[10]  Simone Mueller,et al.  The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness , 2010 .

[11]  Valeria Mazzoleni,et al.  Effect of wine style on the perception of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, a compound related to cork taint in wine , 2007 .

[12]  James A. Kennedy,et al.  Effects of Bottle Closure Type on Consumer Perceptions of Wine Quality , 2007, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[13]  Peter Gates,et al.  The influence of product packaging on young people's palatability rating for RTDS and other alcoholic beverages. , 2006, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[14]  C. Spence,et al.  Auditory contributions to multisensory product perception , 2006 .

[15]  John Prescott,et al.  Estimating a “consumer rejection threshold” for cork taint in white wine , 2005 .

[16]  H. Buser,et al.  Identification of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole as a potent compound causing cork taint in wine , 1982 .

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the Role of Emotional Associations in Mediating Crossmodal Correspondences between Classical Music and Red Wine , 2017 .

[18]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effect of changing a bottled beer label on taste ratings , 2016 .

[19]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory Packaging Design: Color, Shape, Texture, Sound, and Smell , 2016 .