Changes in posture alter the attentional demands of voluntary movement

Two simple experiments reveal that the ease with which an action is performed by the neuromuscular–skeletal system determines the attentional resources devoted to the movement. Participants were required to perform a primary task, consisting of rhythmic flexion and extension movements of the index finger, while being paced by an auditory metronome, in one of two modes of coordination: flex on the beat or extend on the beat. Using a classical dual–task methodology, we demonstrated that the time taken to react to an unpredictable visual probe stimulus (the secondary task) by means of a pedal response was greater when the extension phase of the finger movement sequence was made on the beat of the metronome than when the flexion phase was coordinated with the beat. In a second experiment, the posture of the wrist was manipulated in order to alter the operating lengths of muscles that flex and extend the index finger. The attentional demands of maintaining the extend–on–the–beat pattern of coordination were altered in a systematic fashion by changes in wrist posture, even though the effector used to respond to the visual probe stimulus was unaffected.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  M. Schieber,et al.  How somatotopic is the motor cortex hand area? , 1993, Science.

[3]  J. Kelso,et al.  The informational character of self-organized coordination dynamics , 1994 .

[4]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[6]  R. Lemon The output map of the primate motor cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[8]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[9]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Cerebral activation covaries with movement rate , 1996, Neuroreport.

[11]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Dynamic cortical activity in the human brain reveals motor equivalence , 1998, Nature.

[12]  S. Riek,et al.  The influence of joint position on the dynamics of perception-action coupling , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Effects of task instructions and oscillation frequency on bimanual coordination , 1996, Psychological research.

[14]  J. Wessberg,et al.  Organization of motor output in slow finger movements in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  J. Kelso,et al.  Action-Perception as a Pattern Formation Process , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[16]  D. Thompson,et al.  A clinical study of forces generated by the intrinsic muscles of the index finger and the extrinsic flexor and extensor muscles of the hand. , 1978, The Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  John Duncan,et al.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities , 1997, Nature.

[18]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Corticospinal neurones. Their role in movement. , 1977, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[19]  C. Svarer,et al.  Rate Dependence of Regional Cerebral Activation during Performance of a Repetitive Motor Task: A PET Study , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  G. Ermentrout Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[21]  R. Nathan,et al.  The isometric action of the forearm muscles. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  E. Fetz,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying corticospinal and rubrospinal control of limb movements. , 1991, Progress in brain research.