Sexual isolation and extreme morphological divergence in the Cumaná guppy: a possible case of incipient speciation

Theory predicts that sexual selection can promote the evolution of reproductive isolation and speciation. Those cases in which sexual selection has led to speciation should be characterized by significant differentiation in male display traits and correlated female preferences in the absence of post‐zygotic isolation, accompanied by little genetic or other morphological differentiation. Previous evidence indicates that a cluster of populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata Peters) from Cumaná, Venezuela, the ‘Cumaná guppy’, differs significantly in female preferences from a nearby guppy population (A. Lindholm & F. Breden, Am. Nat., 160: 2002, S214). Here, we further document sexual isolation between these populations. In addition, these populations exhibit significant divergence in male display traits correlated to differences in between‐population mating success, little mitochondrial genetic differentiation, and we find no evidence for genetic incompatibility between a Cumaná population and several geographically isolated populations. These results suggest that divergent sexual selection has contributed to differentiation of the Cumaná guppy, and this may be the first example of incipient speciation in the guppy.

[1]  H. Waterbolk,et al.  Ethological Studies On Lebistes Reticulatus (Peters) , 1955 .

[2]  D. Rosen,et al.  The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes) : their structure, zoogeography, and systematics. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 126, article 1 , 1963 .

[3]  N. Liley.  Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes , 1966 .

[4]  D. Mihalas.  Balmer-Line Model Atmospheres for A-Type Stars , 1966 .

[5]  J. Endler.  NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  T. Goodwin.  The biochemistry of the carotenoids , 1980 .

[7]  R. Lande.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[9]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Body Form, Locomotion and Foraging in Aquatic Vertebrates , 1984 .

[10]  F. Breden,et al.  Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy , 1987, Nature.

[11]  A. Houde.  MATE CHOICE BASED UPON NATURALLY OCCURRING COLOR‐PATTERN VARIATION IN A GUPPY POPULATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  A. Houde.  Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  O. Hasson.  Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection: a different emphasis , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  H. A. Orr,et al.  PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[17]  J. Endler,et al.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.

[18]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males , 1990, Nature.

[19]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The Role of Male Ornaments and Courtship Behavior in Female Mate Choice of Red Jungle Fowl , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. , 1998 .

[21]  G. Hill.  Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality , 1991, Nature.

[22]  F. Breden,et al.  MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AMONG NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE TRINIDAD GUPPY, POECILIA RETICULATA , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  A. Houde,et al.  Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies , 1992 .

[24]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  D. Schluter,et al.  Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  A. Magurran,et al.  The Behavioral Diversity and Evolution of Guppy, Poecilia reticulata, Populations in Trinidad , 1995 .

[27]  J. Endler,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  P. Harvey,et al.  Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  R. Brooks,et al.  Manipulating a seemingly non-preferred male ornament reveals a role in female choice , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  J. Endler.  Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Species Richness Covaries with Mating System in Birds , 1996 .

[32]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) Using Partial-Warp Scores , 1996 .

[33]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape , 1997 .

[34]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1997, Science.

[35]  A. Møller,et al.  SPECIATION AND FEATHER ORNAMENTATION IN BIRDS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[37]  A. Magurran.  Population differentiation without speciation , 1998 .

[38]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  F. Breden,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships among the mollies (Poeciliidae: Poecilia: Mollienesia group) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences , 1998 .

[40]  T. Price.  Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation , 1998 .

[41]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.

[42]  M. Higashi,et al.  Sympatric speciation by sexual selection , 1999, Nature.

[43]  Seehausen,et al.  Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria , 1999 .

[44]  Kevin C. Nixon.  Regular ArticleThe Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis☆ , 1999 .

[45]  D. Millie,et al.  Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  F. Breden,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the live-bearing fish genus Poecilia (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[47]  Michael A. Bell,et al.  Net evolutionary trajectories of body shape evolution within a microgeographic radiation of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) , 2000 .

[48]  G. Borgia,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION DRIVES RAPID DIVERGENCE IN BOWERBIRD DISPLAY TRAITS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  W. Cade,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  L Nagel,et al.  Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. , 2000, Science.

[51]  SEXUAL SELECTION DRIVES RAPID DIVERGENCE IN BOWERBIRD DISPLAY TRAITS , 2000 .

[52]  K. Nixon,et al.  The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[53]  M. Higgie,et al.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. , 2000, Science.

[54]  J. Dale.  Ornamental plumage does not signal male quality in red-billed queleas , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  R. Brooks.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival , 2000, Nature.

[56]  T. Quinn,et al.  Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. , 2000, Science.

[57]  N. Barton,et al.  Theory and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  J. M. Lynch,et al.  Use of Geometric Morphometrics to Differentiate Gila (Cyprinidae) within the Upper Colorado River Basin , 2001, Copeia.

[59]  COUNTERGRADIENT VARIATION AND SECONDARY SEXUAL COLOR: PHENOTYPIC CONVERGENCE PROMOTES GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN CAROTENOID USE BETWEEN SYMPATRIC ANADROMOUS AND NONANADROMOUS MORPHS OF SOCKEYE SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS NERKA) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  G. Turner.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2001, Heredity.

[62]  B. Crespi,et al.  Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation , 2002, Nature.

[63]  RAPID EVOLUTION OF ESCAPE ABILITY IN TRINIDADIAN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) , 2002 .

[64]  Felix Breden,et al.  Sex Chromosomes and Sexual Selection in Poeciliid Fishes , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[65]  R. Vos,et al.  Accelerated likelihood surface exploration: the likelihood ratchet. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[66]  Jennifer R. Moran,et al.  Ecological Adaptation During Incipient Speciation Revealed by Precise Gene Replacement , 2003, Science.

[67]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[68]  K. Winemiller,et al.  Phenotypic variation in male guppies from natural inland populations: an additional test of Haskins' sexual selection/predation hypothesis , 1990, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[69]  F. Breden,et al.  Phenotypic differentiation in female preference related to geographic variation in male predation risk in the Trinidad guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  R. Langerhans,et al.  Shared and Unique Features of Evolutionary Diversification , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[71]  A. Kodric‐Brown.  Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[72]  J. Endler.  Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[73]  Melanin as a visual signal amplifier in male guppies , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[74]  H. Kishino,et al.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[75]  B. Manly.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .