Transport of kinetically sorbing solute by steady random velocity in heterogeneous porous formations

A Lagrangian framework is used for analysing reactive solute transport by a steady random velocity field, which is associated with flow through a heterogeneous porous formation. The reaction considered is kinetically controlled sorption–desorption. Transport is quantified by the expected values of spatial and temporal moments that are derived as functions of the non-reactive moments and a distribution function which characterizes sorption kinetics. Thus the results of this study generalize the previously obtained results for transport of non-reactive solutes in heterogeneous formations (Dagan 1984; Dagan et al. 1992). The results are illustrated for first-order linear sorption reactions. The general effect of sorption is to retard the solute movement. For short time, the transport process coincides with a non-reactive case, whereas for large time sorption is in equilibrium and solute is simply retarded by a factor R = 1+ K d , where K d is the partitioning coefficient. Within these limits, the interaction between the heterogeniety and kinetics yields characteristic nonlinearities in the first three spatial moments. Asymmetry in the spatial solute distribution is a typical kinetic effect. Critical parameters that control sorptive transport asymptotically are the ratio e r between a typical reaction length and the longitudinal effective (non-reactive) dispersivity, and K d . The asymptotic effective dispersivity for equilibrium conditions is derived as a function of parameters e r and K d . A qualitative agreement with field data is illustrated for the zero- and first-order spatial moments.

[1]  G. Dagan Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: 2. The solute transport , 1982 .

[2]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Mark N. Goltz,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 3. Retardation estimates and mass balances for organic solutes , 1986 .

[4]  J. B. Rosen Kinetics of a Fixed Bed System for Solid Diffusion into Spherical Particles , 1952 .

[5]  D. Chin,et al.  An investigation of the validity of first‐order stochastic dispersion theories in isotropie porous media , 1992 .

[6]  K. Lassey Unidimensional Solute Transport Incorporating Equilibrium and Rate-Limited Isotherms With First-Order Loss 1. Model Conceptualizations and Analytic Solutions , 1988 .

[7]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic c , 1992 .

[8]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Macrodispersion of sorbing solutes in heterogeneous porous formations with spatially periodic retardation factor and velocity field , 1992 .

[9]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Validity of the local equilibrium assumption for modeling sorbing solute transport through homogeneous soils , 1985 .

[10]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations: 2. Uncertainty analysis , 1992 .

[11]  G. Dagan,et al.  Spatial moments of a kinetically sorbing solute plume in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1993 .

[12]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Modeling solute advection coupled with sorption kinetics in heterogeneous formations , 1992 .

[13]  Robert W. Gillham,et al.  Sorption nonideality during organic contaminant transport in porous media , 1989 .

[14]  Y. Rubin Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[15]  L. Katz,et al.  Sorption phenomena in subsurface systems: Concepts, models and effects on contaminant fate and transport , 1991 .

[16]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions , 1978 .

[17]  Anders Rasmuson,et al.  An approach to modelling radionuclide migration in a medium with strongly varying velocity and block sizes along the flow path , 1984 .

[18]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media. I. Analytical solutions , 1976 .

[19]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[20]  C. S. Simmons A stochastic‐convective transport representation of dispersion in one‐dimensional porous media systems , 1982 .

[21]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Eulerian‐Lagrangian Theory of transport in space‐time nonstationary velocity fields: Exact nonlocal formalism by conditional moments and weak approximation , 1993 .

[22]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Mass arrival of sorptive solute in heterogeneous porous media. , 1990 .

[23]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Modeling kinetic non-equilibrium using the first two moments of the residence time distribution , 1991 .

[24]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  A stochastic model of reactive solute transport with time‐varying velocity in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1991 .

[25]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Modeling tritium and chloride 36 transport through an aggregated oxisol , 1983 .

[26]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  Modeling the Nonequilibrium Transport of Linearly Interacting Solutes in Porous Media: A Review , 1991 .

[27]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Models for simulating salt movement in aggregated field soils , 1986 .

[28]  R. Gillham,et al.  Laboratory and field measurements of non-equilibrium transport in the Borden aquifer, Ontario, Canada , 1992 .

[29]  A. Klute,et al.  Convective‐dispersive solute transport with a combined equilibrium and kinetic adsorption model , 1977 .

[30]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[31]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Stochastic analysis of solute arrival time in heterogeneous porous media , 1988 .

[32]  G. Dagan,et al.  A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations: 1. The general framework , 1992 .

[33]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Theory of Solute Transport by Groundwater , 1987 .

[34]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Simulation of dispersion in heterogeneous porous formations: Statistics, first‐order theories, convergence of computations , 1992 .

[35]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Sorption of hydrophobic organic pollutants in saturated soil systems , 1986 .

[36]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion , 1990 .

[37]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Spatial moment analysis of the transport of kinetically adsorbing solutes through stratified aquifers , 1989 .

[38]  G. Dagan Dispersion of a passive solute in non-ergodic transport by steady velocity fields in heterogeneous formations , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[39]  David L. Freyberg,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 2. Spatial moments and the advection and dispersion of nonreactive tracers , 1986 .

[40]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Field scale mass arrival of sorptive solute into the groundwater , 1991 .

[41]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Stochastic theory of field‐scale fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media , 1987 .

[42]  Jacques Villermaux,et al.  Deformation of Chromatographic Peaks Under the Influence of Mass Transfer Phenomena , 1974 .

[43]  Mark N. Goltz,et al.  Using the method of moments to analyze three-dimensional diffusion-limited solute transport from tem , 1987 .

[44]  R. Knapp Spatial and temporal scales of local equilibrium in dynamic fluid-rock systems , 1989 .

[45]  Mark N. Goltz,et al.  Interpreting organic solute transport data from a field experiment using physical nonequilibrium models , 1986 .