An accurate calibration method of the multileaf collimator valid for conformal and intensity modulated radiation treatments.

Because for IMRT treatments the required accuracy on leaf positioning is high, conventional calibration methods may not be appropriate. The aim of this study was to develop the tools for an accurate MLC calibration valid for conventional and IMRT treatments and to investigate the stability of the MLC. A strip test consisting of nine adjacent segments 2 cm wide, separated by 1 mm and exposed on Kodak X-Omat V films at Dmax depth, was used for detecting leaf-positioning errors. Dose profiles along the leaf-axis were taken for each leaf-pair. We measured the dose variation on each abutment to quantify the relative positioning error (RPE) and the absolute position of the abutment to quantify the absolute positioning error (APE). The accuracy of determining the APE and RPE was 0.15 and 0.04 mm, respectively. Using the RPE and the APE the MLC calibration parameters were calculated in order to obtain a flat profile on the abutment at the correct position. A conventionally calibrated Elekta MLC was re-calibrated using the strip test. The stability of the MLC and leaf-positioning reproducibility was investigated exposing films with 25 adjacent segments 1 cm wide during three months and measuring the standard deviation of the RPE values. A maximum shift over the three months of 0.27 mm was observed and the standard deviation of the RPE values was 0.11 mm.

[1]  J. Palta,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for a multileaf collimator system. , 1996, Medical physics.

[2]  Multileaf collimation versus conventional shielding blocks: a time and motion study of beam shaping in radiotherapy. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  T. Losasso,et al.  Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: analysis of geometric accuracy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A L Boyer,et al.  Clinical dosimetry for implementation of a multileaf collimator. , 1992, Medical physics.

[5]  Clinically shaped fields: relative outputs for Varian multileaf collimators and tray-mounted cerrobend blocks. , 1999, Medical physics.

[6]  A L Boyer,et al.  Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends. , 1997, Medical physics.

[7]  D L McShan,et al.  Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  P. C. Williams,et al.  The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  P. C. Williams,et al.  Requirements for leaf position accuracy for dynamic multileaf collimation. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  I J Das,et al.  Role of multileaf collimator in replacing shielding blocks in radiation therapy , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[11]  T. Cullip,et al.  Intensity modulation delivery techniques: "step & shoot" MLC auto-sequence versus the use of a modulator. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  S. Morrill,et al.  MLC quality assurance techniques for IMRT applications. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  T. Jordan,et al.  Quality control aspects of the Philips multileaf collimator. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Lei Xing,et al.  Using the volumetric effect of a finite-sized detector for routine quality assurance of multileaf collimator leaf positioning. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  Compensation of x-ray beam penumbra in conformal radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  M Saiful Huq,et al.  A dosimetric comparison of various multileaf collimators. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  T. Pawlicki,et al.  The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[18]  Chen-Shou Chui,et al.  Quality Assurance of IMRT , 2000 .

[19]  T LoSasso,et al.  Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode. , 2001, Medical physics.

[20]  C. Ling,et al.  Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[21]  Maarten L P Dirkx,et al.  Fast and accurate leaf verification for dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  James M. Galvin,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR SYSTEM , 1993 .

[23]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2002, Medical physics.

[24]  T LoSasso,et al.  Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1996, Medical physics.

[25]  Yan Chen,et al.  Calculation of x-ray transmission through a multileaf collimator. , 2000, Medical physics.

[26]  G T Chen,et al.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery error from radiation field offset inaccuracy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  S Mutic,et al.  Characterization of a commercial multileaf collimator used for intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[28]  T LoSasso,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated fields. , 1996, Medical physics.