How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition?

How do we recall a word's spelling? How do we produce the movements to form the letters of a word? Writing involves several processing levels. Surprisingly, researchers have focused either on spelling or motor production. However, these processes interact and cannot be studied separately. Spelling processes cascade into movement production. For example, in French, producing letters PAR in the orthographically irregular word PARFUM (perfume) delays motor production with respect to the same letters in the regular word PARDON (pardon). Orthographic regularity refers to the possibility of spelling a word correctly by applying the most frequent sound-letter conversion rules. The present study examined how the interaction between spelling and motor processing builds up during writing acquisition. French 8-10 year old children participated in the experiment. This is the age handwriting skills start to become automatic. The children wrote regular and irregular words that could be frequent or infrequent. They wrote on a digitizer so we could collect data on latency, movement duration and fluency. The results revealed that the interaction between spelling and motor processing was present already at age 8. It became more adult-like at ages 9 and 10. Before starting to write, processing irregular words took longer than regular words. This processing load spread into movement production. It increased writing duration and rendered the movements more dysfluent. Word frequency affected latencies and cascaded into production. It modulated writing duration but not movement fluency. Writing infrequent words took longer than frequent words. The data suggests that orthographic regularity has a stronger impact on writing than word frequency. They do not cascade in the same extent.

[1]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[2]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE PRODUCTION OF CONNECTING STROKES IN CURSIVE WRITING: DEVELOPING CO-ARTICULATION IN 8 TO 12 YEAR-OLD CHILDREN , 1989 .

[3]  D. Share Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[4]  Sonia Kandel,et al.  Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[5]  U. Frith A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia , 1986, Annals of dyslexia.

[6]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Autonomy of Lexical Orthography , 1997 .

[7]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Computer recognition and human production of handwriting , 1989 .

[8]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Phonological effects in handwriting production: evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  R. Peereman,et al.  Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Stroop-Type Interference: Congruity Effects in Color Naming With Typewritten Responses , 1998 .

[11]  M. Damian,et al.  Phonology Contributes to Writing , 2011, Psychological science.

[12]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  G. Eden,et al.  Examining the Central and Peripheral Processes of Written Word Production Through Meta-Analysis , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[14]  A. Beaton,et al.  Semantic Errors of Naming, Reading, Writing, and Drawing Following Left-Hemisphere Infarction , 1997 .

[15]  Terezinha Nunes,et al.  Handbook of children's literacy , 2004 .

[16]  Bernard Lété,et al.  Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme—phoneme mappings, and infralexical and lexical units in child-directed written material , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[17]  B. Rapp,et al.  The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Processing prefixes and suffixes in handwriting production. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Gilles Caporossi,et al.  Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: effects of regularity and frequency. , 2011, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[20]  Bernard Lété,et al.  MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French , 1996 .

[22]  G. V. Galen,et al.  The Acquisition of Skilled Handwriting: Discontinuous Trends in Kinematic Variables , 1988 .

[23]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[24]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE ROLE OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND THE MOTOR BUFFER IN HANDWRITING UNDER VISUAL AND NON-VISUAL GUIDANCE , 1989 .

[25]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Advance planning of form properties in the written production of single and multiple words , 2009 .

[26]  P. Mounoud,et al.  Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency on handwriting production in children and adults. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[27]  M. Fayol,et al.  Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production , 2009, Cognition.

[28]  S. Kandel,et al.  Does visual attention span relate to eye movements during reading and copying? , 2014 .

[29]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations , 1990, Cognition.

[31]  J. Démonet,et al.  The “handwriting brain”: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes , 2013, Cortex.

[32]  U. Halsband,et al.  Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[33]  M. Damian,et al.  Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[34]  R. Peereman,et al.  Do Phonological Codes Constrain the Selection of Orthographic Codes in Written Picture Naming , 2001 .

[35]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[36]  E. Warrington,et al.  Ideational agraphia: a single case study. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[37]  Sylviane Valdois,et al.  The effect of orthographic regularity on children’s handwriting production , 2005 .

[38]  O. Afonso,et al.  The interaction between central and peripheral processes in handwriting production , 2013, Cognition.

[39]  Motor development in early and later childhood: longitudinal approaches: Handwriting: a developmental perspective , 1993 .

[40]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[41]  S. Kandel,et al.  Syllables as functional units in a copying task , 2006 .

[42]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Flexible and inflexible response components: a Stroop study with typewritten output. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[43]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting , 1983 .

[44]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Writing dictated words and picture names: Syllabic boundaries affect execution in Spanish , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[45]  Bernard Lété,et al.  Tracking the mind during writing: immediacy, delayed, and anticipatory effects on pauses and writing rate , 2011, Reading and Writing.

[46]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Independence of Phonological and Orthographic Lexical Forms: Evidence from Aphasia , 1997 .

[47]  C. Barry,et al.  Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  A. Colley,et al.  Cognition and action in skilled behaviour , 1988 .

[49]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[51]  Eric Guin Ductus: A software package for the study of handwriting production , 2010 .

[52]  R. Geuze,et al.  Motor development in early and later childhood: Longitudinal approaches , 1993 .

[53]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[54]  Denis Alamargot,et al.  Influence of handwriting skills during spelling in primary and lower secondary grades , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[55]  G. V. Galen,et al.  On the Simultaneous Processing of Words, Letters and Strokes in Handwriting: Evidence For a Mixed Linear and Parallel Model , 1986 .

[56]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: effects of word length and word frequency. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  R. Peereman,et al.  For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: testing the syllable-bigram controversy. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory ☆ , 1991 .

[60]  D. Bakish,et al.  5-Ht1a Agonists, 5-Ht3 Antagonists and Benzodiazepines: Their Comparative Behavioural Pharmacology , 1991 .

[61]  R. Peereman,et al.  LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[62]  H. Kao,et al.  Graphonomics : contemporary research in handwriting , 1986 .

[63]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Perceptual-motor complexity of printed and cursive letters. , 1990 .

[64]  R. Meulenbroek,et al.  Lateralized effects of orthographical irregularity and auditory memory load on the kinematics of transcription typewriting , 2003, Psychological research.

[65]  Anne Chung,et al.  The neural substrates of writing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003 .

[66]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .