Effects of degree of translation or rotation of acetabular fragment of periacetabular osteotomy procedure on pelvic X-ray parameters

ABSTRACT The present study aims to investigate the effect of amount of lateralization and/or anteversion of the point where the iliac cut meets with the posterior column cut of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), on X-ray parameters such as Center of edge (CE) angle, retroversion index (RVI) and sharp angle. Fourteen patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia (CE° < 20°) were included. Pelvis Computerized tomography (CT) sections were used for 3D printing. PAO was then performed on these models. The point (A), 1 cm lateral to the pelvic brim, is marked where the iliac cut intersects the posterior column cut. In Group I (1.5–0), point A is lateralized parallel to the osteotomy line for 1.5 cm. In Group II (1.5–0.5), it is additionally anteverted for 0.5 cm. In Group III (3–0), point A is lateralized for 3 cm and then additionally anteverted for 1 cm (Group IV: 3–1). Radiographs were taken in each stage. The lateral CE angle, RVI and sharp angle were measured. All had an increase in the CE angle and RVI and a decrease in the sharp angle compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The amount of CE angle (ΔCE) or RVI increase (ΔRV) was as follows: 3–1(38°, 0.3) > 3–0(27°, 0.2) and 1.5–0.5(25°, 0.1) > 1.5–0(17°, 0.07) (P < 0.05) (with no difference between groups 1.5–0.5 and 3–0, P = 0.7). The amount of sharp angle decrease was as follows: 3–1(20°), 3–0(18°) < 1.5–0.5(11°) < 1.5–0(8°) (P < 0.05). The lateralization of the intersection point where the iliac wing cut meets with the posterior column cut along the cut surface led to an increase of lateral cover and focal retroversion. Additional anteversion leads to further increases in those parameters, while groups 1.5–0.5 and 3–0 did not differ between.

[1]  D. Murphy,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printing on quantitative and qualitative outcomes in paediatric orthopaedic osteotomies: a systematic review , 2021, EFORT open reviews.

[2]  T. Shelton,et al.  PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY , 2020, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[3]  B. Markhardt,et al.  3D-printed models for periacetabular osteotomy surgical planning , 2020, Journal of hip preservation surgery.

[4]  Evan P. Roush,et al.  Effects of variations in Dwyer calcaneal osteotomy determined by three‐dimensional printed patient‐specific modeling , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Linzhen Xie,et al.  3D printing-based Ganz approach for treatment of femoral head fractures: a prospective analysis , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[6]  Linlin Zhang,et al.  Development of a novel customized cutting and rotating template for Bernese periacetabular osteotomy , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[7]  Ryan T. Li,et al.  Does Pelvic Rotation Alter Radiologic Measurement of Anterior and Lateral Acetabular Coverage? , 2019, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  C. Farnsworth,et al.  Comparison of 3 Pediatric Pelvic Osteotomies for Acetabular Dysplasia Using Patient-specific 3D-printed Models , 2019, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  Ryan T. Li,et al.  Use of the False-Profile Radiographic View to Measure Pelvic Incidence , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  Max P. Michalski,et al.  Use of 3D Prints to Compare the Efficacy of Three Different Calcaneal Osteotomies for the Correction of Heel Varus , 2017, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  Dimitrios Mitsouras,et al.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  M. Takaso,et al.  Pre-operative simulation of periacetabular osteotomy via a three-dimensional model constructed from salt , 2017, SICOT-J.

[13]  Wei Li,et al.  Application of a 3-dimensional printed navigation template in Bernese periacetabular osteotomies , 2016, Medicine.

[14]  R. Ganz,et al.  The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy , 1998, Der Orthopäde.

[15]  S. Nho,et al.  Correlation of Pelvic Incidence With Cam and Pincer Lesions , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  D. Howie,et al.  Dilemmas in imaging for peri-acetabular osteotomy: the influence of patient position and imaging technique on the radiological features of hip dysplasia. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[17]  H. Hosalkar,et al.  Lateral Center-edge Angle on Conventional Radiography and Computed Tomography , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  H. Hosalkar,et al.  EOS imaging of the human pelvis: reliability, validity, and controlled comparison with radiography. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Kjeld Søballe,et al.  What Factors Predict Failure 4 to 12 Years After Periacetabular Osteotomy? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of severe acetabular dysplasia. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  R. Ganz,et al.  Effect of Pelvic Tilt on Acetabular Retroversion: A Study of Pelves From Cadavers , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  W. Capello,et al.  Morphologic Features of the Acetabulum and Femur: Anteversion Angle and Implant Positioning , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R. Tague Variation in pelvic size between males and females. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  R. Ganz,et al.  A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.