Reconciliation of Rotordynamic Models With Experimental Data

A computationally efficient strategy is presented for adjusting analytic rotordynamic models to make them consistent with experimental data. The approach permits use of conventional rotordynamic models derived using finite element methods in conjunction with conventional plant identification models derived from impact or sine sweep testing in a transfer function or influence coefficient format. The underlying assumption is that the predominant uncertainties in engineered models occur at discrete points as effects like shrink fits, seal coefficients or foundation interactions. Further, it is assumed that these unmodeled or poorly modeled effects are essentially linear (at least within the testing and expected operating domains). Matching is accomplished by deriving a dynamic model for these uncertain effects such that the resulting composite model has a transfer function which matches that obtained experimentally. The derived augmentations are computationally compatible with the original rotor model and valid for stability or forced response predictions. Further, computation of this augmentation is accomplished using well developed and widely disseminated tools for modern control. Background theory and a complete recipe for the solution are supported by a number of examples.

[1]  E. H. Maslen,et al.  A Stability Model for Flexible Rotors With Magnetic Bearings , 1992 .

[2]  K. E. Rouch,et al.  Generating matrices of the foundation structure of a rotor system from test data , 1992 .

[3]  J. M. Vance,et al.  Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery , 1988 .

[4]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[5]  C. Sanathanan,et al.  Transfer function synthesis as a ratio of two complex polynomials , 1963 .

[6]  L. E. Barrett,et al.  Transfer function representation of flexible supports and casings of rotating machinery , 1999 .

[7]  H. D. Nelson,et al.  The Dynamics of Rotor-Bearing Systems Using Finite Elements , 1976 .

[8]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[9]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Kameshwar Poolla,et al.  On the identification of high-order lightly-damped multivariable systems , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[11]  Ian Russell Redmond Practical Rotordynamics Modeling Using Combined Measured and Theoretical Data , 1995 .

[12]  K. Poolla,et al.  An LFT approach to parameter estimation , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[13]  Fredric F. Ehrlich,et al.  Handbook of Rotordynamics , 2004 .

[14]  John M. Vance,et al.  Critical Speeds of Turbomachinery: Computer Predictions vs. Experimental Measurements—Part I: The Rotor Mass—Elastic Model , 1987 .

[15]  J. W. Lund,et al.  Stability and Damped Critical Speeds of a Flexible Rotor in Fluid-Film Bearings , 1974 .

[16]  Conard Gähler,et al.  Identification of magnetic bearing systems , 1995 .