The Damaging Effect of Passenger Mutations on Cancer Progression.

Genomic instability and high mutation rates cause cancer to acquire numerous mutations and chromosomal alterations during its somatic evolution; most are termed passengers because they do not confer cancer phenotypes. Evolutionary simulations and cancer genomic studies suggest that mildly deleterious passengers accumulate and can collectively slow cancer progression. Clinical data also suggest an association between passenger load and response to therapeutics, yet no causal link between the effects of passengers and cancer progression has been established. To assess this, we introduced increasing passenger loads into human cell lines and immunocompromised mouse models. We found that passengers dramatically reduced proliferative fitness (∼3% per Mb), slowed tumor growth, and reduced metastatic progression. We developed new genomic measures of damaging passenger load that can accurately predict the fitness costs of passengers in cell lines and in human breast cancers. We conclude that genomic instability and an elevated load of DNA alterations in cancer is a double-edged sword: it accelerates the accumulation of adaptive drivers, but incurs a harmful passenger load that can outweigh driver benefit. The effects of passenger alterations on cancer fitness were unrelated to enhanced immunity, as our tests were performed either in cell culture or in immunocompromised animals. Our findings refute traditional paradigms of passengers as neutral events, suggesting that passenger load reduces the fitness of cancer cells and slows or prevents progression of both primary and metastatic disease. The antitumor effects of chemotherapies can in part be due to the induction of genomic instability and increased passenger load. Cancer Res; 77(18); 4763-72. ©2017 AACR.

[1]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[2]  Leonid A. Mirny,et al.  Tug-of-war between driver and passenger mutations in cancer and other adaptive processes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Andrea Sottoriva,et al.  Defining Stem Cell Dynamics in Models of Intestinal Tumor Initiation , 2013, Science.

[4]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  The mini-driver model of polygenic cancer evolution , 2015, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  G. Getz,et al.  High-order chromatin architecture shapes the landscape of chromosomal alterations in cancer , 2012 .

[6]  J. Quiles,et al.  Antioxidant nutrients and adriamycin toxicity. , 2002, Toxicology.

[7]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer , 2012, Nature.

[8]  H. Ruley,et al.  Carcinogens induce genome-wide loss of heterozygosity in normal stem cells without persistent chromosomal instability. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. Maley,et al.  Cancer is a disease of clonal evolution within the body1–3. This has profound clinical implications for neoplastic progression, cancer prevention and cancer therapy. Although the idea of cancer as an evolutionary problem , 2006 .

[10]  R. Nussinov,et al.  'Latent drivers' expand the cancer mutational landscape. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[11]  N. Hacohen,et al.  Molecular and Genetic Properties of Tumors Associated with Local Immune Cytolytic Activity , 2015, Cell.

[12]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  Assessing the Evolutionary Impact of Amino Acid Mutations in the Human Genome , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[14]  M. Kimura Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  I. Gordo,et al.  ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL POPULATIONS UNDER MULLER'S RATCHET , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[17]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy-number alteration , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Z. Modrušan,et al.  Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Damian Smedley,et al.  BioMart Central Portal: an open database network for the biological community , 2011, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[21]  M. Lynch,et al.  MULLER'S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  N. Hynes,et al.  Co-expression of HER2 and HER3 receptor tyrosine kinases enhances invasion of breast cells via stimulation of interleukin-8 autocrine secretion , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  C. Swanton,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity and drug resistance: personalising cancer medicine through functional genomics. , 2012, Biochemical pharmacology.

[25]  Rocio Sotillo,et al.  Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Deleterious Passengers in Adapting Populations , 2014, Genetics.

[27]  P. Duesberg,et al.  Explaining the high mutation rates of cancer cells to drug and multidrug resistance by chromosome reassortments that are catalyzed by aneuploidy. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Zoltan Szallasi,et al.  Paradoxical relationship between chromosomal instability and survival outcome in cancer. , 2011, Cancer research.

[29]  S. Sunyaev,et al.  Human allelic variation: perspective from protein function, structure, and evolution. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  L. Chin,et al.  Passenger Deletions Generate Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Cancer , 2012, Nature.

[31]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Quantifying Clonal and Subclonal Passenger Mutations in Cancer Evolution , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Profiles of Genomic Instability in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Predict Treatment Outcome , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  Maxim N. Artyomov,et al.  Checkpoint Blockade Cancer Immunotherapy Targets Tumour-Specific Mutant Antigens , 2014, Nature.

[34]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  The human genome browser at UCSC. , 2002, Genome research.

[35]  Cristina Montagna,et al.  Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[36]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[37]  Jamal Tazi,et al.  Regulated functional alternative splicing in Drosophila , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Angelika Amon,et al.  Aneuploidy Affects Proliferation and Spontaneous Immortalization in Mammalian Cells , 2008, Science.

[39]  M. Lynch,et al.  Transitions to Asexuality Result in Excess Amino Acid Substitutions , 2006, Science.

[40]  N. McGranahan,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution , 2013, Nature.

[41]  Christopher. Simons,et al.  Machine learning with Python , 2017 .

[42]  M. Stampfer,et al.  Oncogenes induce senescence with incomplete growth arrest and suppress the DNA damage response in immortalized cells , 2011, Aging cell.

[43]  S. Frank Dynamics of Cancer: Incidence, Inheritance, and Evolution , 2007 .

[44]  S. Hochreiter,et al.  cn.MOPS: mixture of Poissons for discovering copy number variations in next-generation sequencing data with a low false discovery rate , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Genetic Basis for Clinical Response to CTLA-4 Blockade in Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  Pengyuan Liu,et al.  Identification of the transforming STRN-ALK fusion as a potential therapeutic target in the aggressive forms of thyroid cancer , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Shamil R. Sunyaev,et al.  Impact of deleterious passenger mutations on cancer progression , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  E. Levanon,et al.  Human housekeeping genes, revisited. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[49]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[50]  A. Jackson,et al.  The mutation rate and cancer. , 1998, Genetics.

[51]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[52]  Christopher D. McFarland,et al.  Oncogene-triggered suppression of DNA repair leads to DNA instability in cancer , 2014, Oncotarget.