Exploring probation officer styles and goals with individual, organizational, and social characteristics

Probation offices are organizational units that provide the structure necessary to develop shared meaning systems that influence individual level attitudes, values, and beliefs. We analyze survey responses (n = 252) from county-level probation departments (n = 19) in a single state. The dependent variables are three-factor scales combining items to measure enforcement, reentry, and protection scales. Our central goal is to determine if the authoritarian (i.e. law enforcement) and assistance (i.e. social worker) typologies predict supervision goals. The robust regression analyses show that department (e.g. caseload size, number of officers) and county-level measures of poverty and percent black in the population are significant factors for enforcement and reentry. The article concludes with policy implications.

[1]  J. Cleland,et al.  A culture of control? , 2019, Medical education.

[2]  Matthew DeMichele,et al.  Studying the community corrections field: Applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control , 2014 .

[3]  I. Ajzen Martin Fishbein’s Legacy , 2012 .

[4]  Ioan Durnescu Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights , 2011, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[5]  Jeffrey Lin,et al.  SUPERVISION REGIMES, RISK, AND OFFICIAL REACTIONS TO PAROLEE DEVIANCE* , 2011 .

[6]  Matthew D. Makarios,et al.  The Influence of Parole Officers’ Attitudes on Supervision Practices , 2011 .

[7]  D. Weiman Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity , 2010 .

[8]  A. Kupchik,et al.  What Drives Juvenile Probation Officers? , 2010 .

[9]  Mario A. Paparozzi,et al.  Probation and Parole: Overworked, Misunderstood, and Under-Appreciated: But Why? , 2008 .

[10]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: blending care with control. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[11]  B. David The iron cage revisited : Institutional isomorphism and collec... , 2007 .

[12]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Effect of Psychopathy, Abuse, and Ethnicity on Juvenile Probation Officers’ Decision-Making and Supervision Strategies , 2007, Law and human behavior.

[13]  D. Mackenzie What Works in Corrections: Reducing the Criminal Activities of Offenders and Deliquents , 2006 .

[14]  V. Jenness,et al.  The Reconstitution of Law in Local Settings: Agency Discretion, Ambiguity, and a Surplus of Law in the Policing of Hate Crime , 2005 .

[15]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  An Intensive Supervision Program That Worked: Service Delivery, Professional Orientation, and Organizational Supportiveness , 2005 .

[16]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Power and Sample Size in Multilevel Linear Models , 2005 .

[17]  B. Johnson CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1 , 2005 .

[18]  Richard S. Frase,et al.  The Impact of Contextual Factors on the Decision to Imprison in Large Urban Jurisdictions: A Multilevel Analysis , 2005 .

[19]  Jeff Yates,et al.  Politics and State Punitiveness in Black and White , 2005, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Luís Antônio Francisco de Souza The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary, society , 2003 .

[21]  R. Gainey,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring , 1998 .

[22]  Edward J. Latessa,et al.  Probation officers' roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment , 1993 .

[23]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[24]  Ann Swidler CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[25]  David P. Aday COURT STRUCTURE, DEFENSE ATTORNEY USE, AND JUVENILE COURT DECISIONS , 1986 .

[26]  Janet Katz The Attitudes and Decisions of Probation Officers , 1982 .

[27]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[28]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[29]  Carl B. Klockars A theory of probation supervision. , 1972 .

[30]  Charles H. Shireman The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System , 1965 .

[31]  L. Diana What is Probation , 1960 .

[32]  L. Ohlin,et al.  Major Dilemmas of the Social Worker in Probation and Parole , 1956 .

[33]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Personality , 1940 .

[34]  Anthony W. Tatman,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Social Desirability Scale-17 with Individuals on Probation and Parole in the United States , 2014 .

[35]  F. McNeill Community sanctions and European penology , 2013 .

[36]  M. Phelps The Paradox of Probation: Community Supervision in the Age of Mass Incarceration , 2013 .

[37]  Krešimir Petković Governing Through Crime , 2012 .

[38]  Loïc Wacquant Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity , 2009 .

[39]  Barry C. Feld,et al.  Justice by Geography: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations in Juvenile Justice Administration , 1991 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[41]  Richard McCleary,et al.  Dangerous Men: The Sociology of Parole , 1979 .

[42]  Howard Abadinsky Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice , 1977 .

[43]  J. Laurenson Leadership in administration. , 1965, The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki.

[44]  EVIDENCE-BASED ADULT CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS : WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOES NOT , 2022 .

[45]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Back to the Future: from Klockars' Model of Effective Supervision to Evidence-based Practice in Probation , 2022 .