The multifaceted roles of intrinsic disorder in protein complexes

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) are important constituents of many protein complexes, playing various structural, functional, and regulatory roles. In such disorder‐based protein complexes, functional disorder is used both internally (for assembly, movement, and functional regulation of the different parts of a given complex) and externally (for interactions of a complex with its external regulators). In complex assembly, IDPs/IDPRs serve as the molecular glue that cements complexes or as highly flexible scaffolds. Disorder defines the order of complex assembly and the ability of a protein to be involved in polyvalent interactions. It is at the heart of various binding mechanisms and interaction modes ascribed to IDPs. Disorder in protein complexes is related to multifarious applications of induced folding and induced functional unfolding, or defines the entropic chain activities, such as stochastic machines and binding rheostats. This review opens a FEBS Letters Special Issue on Dynamics, Flexibility, and Intrinsic Disorder in protein assemblies and represents a brief overview of intricate roles played by IDPs and IDPRs in various aspects of protein complexes.

[1]  R. Kriwacki,et al.  Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[2]  Vladimir N. Uversky,et al.  The Mysterious Unfoldome: Structureless, Underappreciated, Yet Vital Part of Any Given Proteome , 2009, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[3]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Protein Complexes Are under Evolutionary Selection to Assemble via Ordered Pathways , 2013, Cell.

[4]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  T. A. Graham,et al.  Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/Tcf complex. , 2000, Cell.

[7]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  Exceptionally abundant exceptions: comprehensive characterization of intrinsic disorder in all domains of life , 2014, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[8]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  Casein Kinase I and Casein Kinase II Differentially Regulate Axin Function in Wnt and JNK Pathways* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  David L. Spector,et al.  Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  T. Pederson,et al.  Protein Mobility within the Nucleus—What Are the Right Moves? , 2001, Cell.

[11]  Kenta Okamoto,et al.  Dissecting β‐ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[12]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The physics and bioinformatics of binding and folding—an energy landscape perspective , 2003, Biopolymers.

[13]  R. Hartmann-Petersen,et al.  Ubiquitin binding proteins protect ubiquitin conjugates from disassembly , 2003, FEBS letters.

[14]  Vladimir N. Uversky,et al.  Conditionally and transiently disordered proteins: awakening cryptic disorder to regulate protein function. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[15]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder Is a Common Feature of Hub Proteins from Four Eukaryotic Interactomes , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  Intrinsic disorder-based protein interactions and their modulators. , 2013, Current pharmaceutical design.

[17]  J. Strahler,et al.  Assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 60S ribosomal subunits: role of factors required for 27S pre‐rRNA processing , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[18]  R. Reeves,et al.  Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function. , 2001, Gene.

[19]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Structural Basis for Regulation of Protein Phosphatase 1 by Inhibitor-2* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  C. Brown,et al.  Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. , 2000, Genome informatics. Workshop on Genome Informatics.

[21]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  The protein trinity—linking function and disorder , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  Single-molecule studies of SNARE complex assembly reveal parallel and antiparallel configurations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Paul Tempst,et al.  SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion , 1993, Nature.

[24]  R. Kiss,et al.  Calcium‐induced tripartite binding of intrinsically disordered calpastatin to its cognate enzyme, calpain , 2008, FEBS letters.

[25]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Mining alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[26]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Parallel dynamics and evolution: Protein conformational fluctuations and assembly reflect evolutionary changes in sequence and structure , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[27]  E. Myers,et al.  Limiting Amounts of Centrosome Material Set Centrosome Size in C. elegans Embryos , 2011, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Parker,et al.  Edc3p and a glutamine/asparagine-rich domain of Lsm4p function in processing body assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  V. Uversky Unusual biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[30]  C. Robinson,et al.  Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[31]  Sergey Melnikov,et al.  The Structure of the Eukaryotic Ribosome at 3.0 Å Resolution , 2011, Science.

[32]  A. Levine,et al.  Induced α Helix in the VP16 Activation Domain upon Binding to a Human TAF , 1997 .

[33]  E. Barbar,et al.  Polybivalency and disordered proteins in ordering macromolecular assemblies. , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[34]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  More than just tails: intrinsic disorder in histone proteins. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[35]  László Buday,et al.  Functional classification of scaffold proteins and related molecules , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[36]  S. Vagner,et al.  DNA damage: RNA-binding proteins protect from near and far. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  T. Südhof,et al.  Membrane Fusion: Grappling with SNARE and SM Proteins , 2009, Science.

[38]  J. King,et al.  Folding and assembly of oligomeric proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[39]  R. Collier,et al.  Use of phage display and polyvalency to design inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[40]  Peter Tompa,et al.  The relationship between proteome size, structural disorder and organism complexity , 2011, Genome Biology.

[41]  A. Dunker,et al.  Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[42]  V. Uversky,et al.  Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.

[43]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  What does it mean to be natively unfolded? , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[44]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[45]  Christine D. Keating,et al.  Aqueous Phase Separation as a Possible Route to Compartmentalization of Biological Molecules , 2012, Accounts of chemical research.

[46]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  The translation initiation factor eIF-4E binds to a common motif shared by the translation factor eIF-4 gamma and the translational repressors 4E-binding proteins , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[48]  A. Gingras,et al.  4E binding proteins inhibit the translation factor eIF4E without folded structure. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[49]  L. Pearl,et al.  Structural basis for recruitment of glycogen synthase kinase 3β to the axin—APC scaffold complex , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[50]  M. Kikuchi,et al.  Structural flexibility of intrinsically disordered proteins induces stepwise target recognition. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[51]  P. Tompa,et al.  Limitations of induced folding in molecular recognition by intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[52]  V. Uversky,et al.  Natively unfolded C‐terminal domain of caldesmon remains substantially unstructured after the effective binding to calmodulin , 2003, Proteins.

[53]  A. Levine,et al.  Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain , 1996, Science.

[54]  Jie J. Zheng,et al.  Crystal structure of a full-length beta-catenin. , 2008, Structure.

[55]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[56]  Yongli Zhang,et al.  High-Resolution Optical Tweezers for Single-Molecule Manipulation , 2013, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[57]  P. Tompa The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins , 2005, FEBS letters.

[58]  A. Keith Dunker,et al.  Mining α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Features with Cross Species Sequence Alignments† , 2007 .

[59]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Solution Structure of the KIX Domain of CBP Bound to the Transactivation Domain of CREB: A Model for Activator:Coactivator Interactions , 1997, Cell.

[60]  P E Wright,et al.  Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  G. V. Vande Woude,et al.  Anthrax toxins , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[62]  R. Perham,et al.  Self-assembly of biological macromolecules. , 1975, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  A creature with a hundred waggly tails: intrinsically disordered proteins in the ribosome , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[64]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: a more stochastic view of protein function. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[65]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[66]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Signal transduction via unstructured protein conduits. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[67]  T. A. Graham,et al.  Crystal Structure of a β-Catenin/Tcf Complex , 2000, Cell.

[68]  U. Jakob,et al.  Conditional disorder in chaperone action. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[69]  P. Romero,et al.  Stochastic machines as a colocalization mechanism for scaffold protein function , 2013, FEBS letters.

[70]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Function and Structure of Inherently Disordered Proteins This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Proteins Edited Prediction of Non-folding Proteins and Regions Frequency of Disordered Regions Protein Evolution Partitioning Unstructured Proteins and Regions into Groups Involvement of Inherently Diso , 2022 .

[71]  William T Heller,et al.  Role of intrinsic flexibility in signal transduction mediated by the cell cycle regulator, p27 Kip1. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  R. Lührmann,et al.  Coilin-dependent snRNP assembly is essential for zebrafish embryogenesis , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[73]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[74]  A. Mohan MoRFs A Dataset of Molecular Recognition Features , 2006 .

[75]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins as crucial constituents of cellular aqueous two phase systems and coacervates , 2015, FEBS letters.

[76]  T. Creamer,et al.  Transient disorder , 2013, Intrinsically disordered proteins.

[77]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks , 2006, FEBS letters.

[78]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2009 .

[79]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes , 2008, Nature.

[80]  A. Dunker,et al.  Orderly order in protein intrinsic disorder distribution: disorder in 3500 proteomes from viruses and the three domains of life , 2012, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[81]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in scaffold proteins: getting more from less. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[82]  N. Nakatsuji,et al.  Ultrastructural characterization of spermatogenesis and its evolutionary conservation in the germline: Germinal granules in mammals , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[83]  Anja Thalhammer,et al.  Disordered Cold Regulated15 Proteins Protect Chloroplast Membranes during Freezing through Binding and Folding, But Do Not Stabilize Chloroplast Enzymes in Vivo1[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[84]  C. Brangwynne Phase transitions and size scaling of membrane-less organelles , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[85]  Jeffrey R. Huth,et al.  The solution structure of an HMG-I(Y)–DNA complex defines a new architectural minor groove binding motif , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[86]  A. Dunker,et al.  Understanding protein non-folding. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[87]  M. Nissen,et al.  The A.T-DNA-binding domain of mammalian high mobility group I chromosomal proteins. A novel peptide motif for recognizing DNA structure. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[88]  Reinhard Jahn,et al.  Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 Å resolution , 1998, Nature.

[89]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Designing a polyvalent inhibitor of anthrax toxin , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[90]  Debasis Dash,et al.  Intrinsic unstructuredness and abundance of PEST motifs in eukaryotic proteomes , 2005, Proteins.

[91]  C. Vonrhein,et al.  Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit , 2000, Nature.

[92]  Kojima Structure and function , 2005 .

[93]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Coupled folding and binding with α-helix-forming molecular recognition elements , 2005 .

[94]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsic disorder and protein function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[95]  Vladislav Yu Orekhov,et al.  Binding of intrinsically disordered proteins is not necessarily accompanied by a structural transition to a folded form. , 2007, Biochimie.

[96]  L. Kay,et al.  Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition , 2009, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[97]  Fei Huang,et al.  Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Protein-Protein Interactions , 2012, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[98]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  H. Chan,et al.  Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Benedikt Westermann,et al.  SNAREpins: Minimal Machinery for Membrane Fusion , 1998, Cell.

[101]  Reinhard Jahn,et al.  Structure and Conformational Changes in NSF and Its Membrane Receptor Complexes Visualized by Quick-Freeze/Deep-Etch Electron Microscopy , 1997, Cell.

[102]  J. Scholey Faculty Opinions recommendation of Characterization of the intraflagellar transport complex B core: direct interaction of the IFT81 and IFT74/72 subunits. , 2005 .

[103]  Z. Obradovic,et al.  Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[104]  J. G. Patton,et al.  Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[105]  H. Dyson,et al.  Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[106]  Timothy D. Craggs,et al.  Phase Transition of a Disordered Nuage Protein Generates Environmentally Responsive Membraneless Organelles , 2015, Molecular cell.

[107]  K. Tomoo,et al.  Binding preference of eIF4E for 4E-binding protein isoform and function of eIF4E N-terminal flexible region for interaction, studied by SPR analysis. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[108]  G. Maul,et al.  Review: properties and assembly mechanisms of ND10, PML bodies, or PODs. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.

[109]  A. Levine,et al.  Induced alpha helix in the VP16 activation domain upon binding to a human TAF. , 1997, Science.

[110]  L. Hengst,et al.  p27 binds cyclin–CDK complexes through a sequential mechanism involving binding-induced protein folding , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[111]  A. Sigalov,et al.  Homooligomerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the T cell receptor zeta chain and of other proteins containing the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[112]  G. Siuzdak,et al.  Molecular basis for the specificity of p27 toward cyclin-dependent kinases that regulate cell division. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[113]  V. Uversky Multitude of binding modes attainable by intrinsically disordered proteins: a portrait gallery of disorder-based complexes. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[114]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics , 2000, Nature.

[115]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Paraspeckles A Novel Nuclear Domain , 2002, Current Biology.

[116]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Mechanism and evolution of protein dimerization , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[117]  K D Paull,et al.  Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. , 1998, Science.

[118]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[119]  H. Dyson,et al.  Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein , 2007, Nature.

[120]  S. Huang Review: perinucleolar structures. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.

[121]  M. Tyers,et al.  Structure/function implications in a dynamic complex of the intrinsically disordered Sic1 with the Cdc4 subunit of an SCF ubiquitin ligase. , 2010, Structure.

[122]  Robert Kiss,et al.  High levels of structural disorder in scaffold proteins as exemplified by a novel neuronal protein, CASK‐interactive protein1 , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[123]  Hideki Yamamoto,et al.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of the axin DIX domain. , 2007, Acta Crystallographica. Section F : Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications.

[124]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Dual Specificity Kinase DYRK3 Couples Stress Granule Condensation/Dissolution to mTORC1 Signaling , 2013, Cell.

[125]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Coupled folding and binding with alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition elements. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[126]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[127]  J. Thornton,et al.  An overview of the structures of protein-DNA complexes , 2000, Genome Biology.

[128]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[129]  S. Teichmann,et al.  The Role of Salt Bridges, Charge Density, and Subunit Flexibility in Determining Disassembly Routes of Protein Complexes , 2013, Structure.

[130]  V. Sheffield,et al.  Intrinsic Protein-Protein Interaction-mediated and Chaperonin-assisted Sequential Assembly of Stable Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Protein Complex, the BBSome* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[131]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  Disordered Proteinaceous Machines , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[132]  V. Uversky Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2000 .

[133]  Sergey V. Melnikov,et al.  The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0 angstrom resolution. , 2011 .

[134]  A. Hyman,et al.  Germline P Granules Are Liquid Droplets That Localize by Controlled Dissolution/Condensation , 2009, Science.

[135]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Interaction of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E with 4E-BP2 at a dynamic bipartite interface. , 2013, Structure.

[136]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[137]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Crystal structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus: structure of the proteins and their interactions with 16 S RNA. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[138]  A. Elofsson,et al.  What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? , 2006, Genome Biology.

[139]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[140]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication , 2001, Nature.