Triple negative breast cancer: a study from the point of view of basal CK5/6 and HER-1

Aim: Basal-like breast tumours, as defined by microarrays, carry a poor prognosis and therapeutic options are limited to date. Often, these tumours are defined as oestrogen receptor (ER) negative/progesterone receptor (PR) negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative (triple negative) by immunohistochemistry (IHC), but a more complete definition should include expression of basal cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14 or CK17) and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (HER-1). The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent CK5/6 and HER-1 characterise the group of triple negative breast cancers. Methods: Expression of CK5/6 and HER-1 was studied by IHC in 25 triple negative breast carcinomas and 32 grade-matched, non-triple-negative controls. All 57 cases were further subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridisation to investigate HER-1 gene copy number. Results: CK5/6 and HER-1 expression was most frequent in triple negative tumours: 22 out of 25 cases (88.0%) expressed at least one of these markers (60.0% CK5/6 positive and 52.0% HER-1 positive). In the control group, CK5/6 and HER-1 expression was found in ER-negative but not in ER-positive tumours (ER negative/PR negative/HER-2 positive tumours: 20.0% CK5/6 positive and 46.7% HER-1 positive). HER-1 gene amplification was found in five cases only: four triple negative (16.0%) and one ER-negative control (ER negative/PR negative/HER-2 positive, 6.7%). Of interest, all five HER-1 amplified cases showed a remarkably homogeneous HER-1 expression pattern. Conclusion: Expression of CK5/6 and HER-1 is frequent in ER-negative breast cancers, in triple negative and in non-triple negative tumours. In a minority of cases, HER-1 overexpression may be caused by HER-1 gene amplification. Further studies are needed to investigate whether such cases might benefit from anti-HER-1 therapy

[1]  G. Hsu,et al.  A Population-Based Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial of Breast Cancer Screening with Alternate Mammography and Ultrasound for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years in Taiwan. , 2009 .

[2]  B. Gusterson Do 'basal-like' breast cancers really exist? , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  K. Horwitz,et al.  The chemoresistant population of luminal subtype human breast cancer cells expresses a basal phenotype. , 2009 .

[4]  Robin L. Jones,et al.  Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[5]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  How basal are triple‐negative breast cancers? , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  S. Jeffrey,et al.  Basal carcinoma of the breast revisited: an old entity with new interpretations , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[9]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  U. Dafni,et al.  Evaluation of the Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER-1/EGFR in Breast Cancer Patients Participating in a Randomized Study with Dose-Dense Sequential Adjuvant Chemotherapy , 2008, Oncology.

[11]  A. Tutt,et al.  Triple negative tumours: a critical review , 2007, Histopathology.

[12]  Harry Bartelink,et al.  Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  H. Kim,et al.  EGFR gene and protein expression in breast cancers. , 2007, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  F. Moinfar Is ‘Basal-Like’ Carcinoma of the Breast a Distinct Clinicopathological Entity? A Critical Review with Cautionary Notes , 2007, Pathobiology.

[15]  Charles M Perou,et al.  EGFR associated expression profiles vary with breast tumor subtype , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[16]  A. Sapino,et al.  Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[17]  E. Paish,et al.  Breast carcinoma with basal differentiation: a proposal for pathology definition based on basal cytokeratin expression , 2007, Histopathology.

[18]  Wolfgang Heller,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  S. Lakhani,et al.  Demystifying basal-like breast carcinomas , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[20]  J. Weidhaas,et al.  Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  A. Ashworth,et al.  EGFR amplification and lack of activating mutations in metaplastic breast carcinomas , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[22]  C. Perou,et al.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. , 2006, JAMA.

[23]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  W. Gerald,et al.  EGFR gene amplification in breast cancer: correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein expression and HER-2 status and absence of EGFR-activating mutations , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[25]  C. de Wolf‐Peeters,et al.  Real‐time reverse transcription‐PCR and fluorescence in‐situ hybridization are complementary to understand the mechanisms involved in HER‐2/neu overexpression in human breast carcinomas , 2005, Histopathology.

[26]  R. Walker,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs , 2005 .

[27]  D. Allred,et al.  Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[28]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  Mark R. Green,et al.  Targeting targeted therapy. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  C. Liedtke,et al.  Gene dosage PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization reveal low frequency of egfr amplifications despite protein overexpression in invasive breast carcinoma , 2004, Laboratory Investigation.

[31]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Y. Yarden,et al.  Untangling the ErbB signalling network , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[34]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  I. Ellis,et al.  Method for grading breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  J G Klijn,et al.  The clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in human breast cancer: a review on 5232 patients. , 1992, Endocrine reviews.

[37]  L. Kuller Breast cancer study. , 1988, Science.

[38]  W. Morgan,et al.  Gene Expression Profiling , 2021, Encyclopedia of Molecular Pharmacology.

[39]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[41]  S. Tsutsui,et al.  Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its relationship to the estrogen receptor status in 1029 patients with breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[42]  R. Walker,et al.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein in primary breast carcinomas , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[43]  Peter Devilee,et al.  Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs , 2003 .

[44]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .