Combining independent modules in lexical multiple-choice problems

Existing statistical approaches to natural language problems are very coarse approximations to the true complexity of language processing. As such, no single technique will be best for all problem instances. Many researchers are examining ensemble methods that combine the output of multiple modules to create more accurate solutions. This paper examines three merging rules for combining probability distributions: the familiar mixture rule, the logarithmic rule, and a novel product rule. These rules were applied with state-of-the-art results to two problems used to assess human mastery of lexical semantics -- synonym questions and analogy questions. All three merging rules result in ensembles that are more accurate than any of their component modules. The differences among the three rules are not statistically significant, but it is suggestive that the popular mixture rule is not the best rule for either of the two problems.

[1]  Peter D. Turney Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL , 2001, ECML.

[2]  Tom Heskes,et al.  Selecting Weighting Factors in Logarithmic Opinion Pools , 1997, NIPS.

[3]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Modeling Consensus: Classifier Combination for Word Sense Disambiguation , 2002, EMNLP.

[4]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[5]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Frequency Estimates for Statistical Word Similarity Measures , 2003, NAACL.

[6]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[7]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Learning Analogies and Semantic Relations , 2003, ArXiv.

[8]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  A probabilistic approach to solving crossword puzzles , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association , 2003, TOIS.

[10]  Eric Brill,et al.  Classifier Combination for Improved Lexical Disambiguation , 1998, ACL.

[11]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  Combining Independent Modules to Solve Multiple-choice Synonym and Analogy Problems , 2003, ArXiv.

[12]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology , 1992, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[13]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[14]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Methods For Combining Experts' Probability Assessments , 1995, Neural Computation.

[15]  Stan Szpakowicz,et al.  Roget's thesaurus and semantic similarity , 2012, RANLP.

[16]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Boosting , 1999, IJCAI.

[17]  Adam Krzyżak,et al.  Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..