A probabilistic agent to support collaboration in a medical learning environment

Social relationships are highly complex activities that are very difficult to model computationally. In order to represent these relationships, we may consider various aspects of the individual, such as affective state, psychological issues and cognition. We may also consider social aspects, as how people relate to each other and to what group they belong. Intelligent tutoring systems, multi-agent systems and affective computing are research areas which our research group have been investigating in order to improve individual and collaborative learning. This paper focuses on a Social Agent which has been modelled using probabilistic networks and acts in an educational application. Using the Social Agent as a testbed, we present a way to perform the deliberation process in BDI and Bayesian networks. The assemblage of mental states and Bayesian networks is done by viewing beliefs as networks and desires and intentions as particular chance variable states that agents pursue. In this work, we are particularly concerned with the deliberation about which states of affairs the agent will intend. The focus of this paper is on how to build a real application by using the deliberation process developed in one of our previous work.

[1]  Conrad N. Jackson,et al.  Curing Those Ol' "Omigod-Not-Another-Group-Class" Blues , 1986 .

[2]  Yang Cao Interpersonal Relationships in Group Interaction in CSCW Environments , 2003 .

[3]  Helder Coelho,et al.  Deliberation Process in a BDI Model with Bayesian Networks , 2009, PRIMA.

[4]  Michael Joseph Peterson,et al.  Skills to Enhance Problem-based Learning , 1997 .

[5]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[6]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  A collaborative bayesian net editor to medical learning environments , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[7]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Inferring user goals from personality and behavior in a causal model of user affect , 2003, IUI '03.

[8]  João Carlos Gluz,et al.  Formal Analysis of the Communication of Probabilistic Knowledge , 2006, IFIP AI.

[9]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  Multi-Agent Based Pedagogical Games , 1998, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  João Carlos Gluz,et al.  A Model of Pedagogical Negotiation , 2005, EPIA.

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Constructing a virtual training laboratory using intelligent agents , 2002 .

[12]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[13]  Helder Coelho,et al.  A multi-agent intelligent environment for medical knowledge , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[14]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  An ontology-based approach to interoperability for Bayesian agents , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[15]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[16]  R. Rieber The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky , 1997 .

[17]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[18]  Cristina Conati,et al.  On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks , 1997 .

[19]  Agostino Poggi,et al.  Jade - a fipa-compliant agent framework , 1999 .

[20]  J. Carroll,et al.  Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[21]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  Social Agents to Improve Collaboration on an Educational Portal , 2006 .

[22]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[23]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[24]  David J. Israel,et al.  Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning , 1988, Comput. Intell..