What makes transplants thrive: managing the transfer of “best practice” at Japanese auto plants in North America

Multinational companies are a conduit by which superior organizing principles can be transferred across national, institutional, and cultural environments. However, for such transplantation efforts to be successful, the companies face the challenge of adapting their practices and principles to the requirements of local environments. In the process they risk losing the performance benefits from those practices. In this paper we study the North American transplant production facilities of Japanese automobile producers--companies known for their ability to achieve superior labor productivity and quality in their manufacturing plants, along with high levels of product variety--for insight into how the practices associated with superior performance (including work systems, technology choices, and supplier relations) can be implemented outside of Japan. By comparing the Japanese transplants with automobile plants in Japan, and Big 3 plants in North America, we show that the extent of transfer varies by type of practice. Furthermore, we find that plants can shape and alter their external environment, and can also buffer themselves from it. Despite these modifications, we find that the transplants are able to achieve productivity and quality levels similar to plants in Japan.

[1]  Joseph J. Fucini,et al.  Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda's American Auto Plant , 1990 .

[2]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and Synthesis , 1985 .

[3]  Ronald Dore,et al.  Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy, 1970-1980 , 1986 .

[4]  Cynthia M. Pavett,et al.  Management Style and Productivity in Two Cultures , 1992 .

[5]  Ann C. Frost Just another car factory? Lean production and its discontents , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  Reply@@@The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. , 1988 .

[7]  M. Aoki Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm , 2013 .

[8]  J. H. Dyer Does Governance Matter? Keiretsu Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[9]  R. Florida,et al.  Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the U.S. , 1993 .

[10]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  The international and temporal diffusion of high-involvement work practices , 1996 .

[11]  小池 和男,et al.  Understanding industrial relations in modern Japan , 1990 .

[12]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Strategies for Assembly Automation in the Automobile Industry , 1997 .

[13]  Haruo Shimada,et al.  Industrial Relations and "Humanware" , 1986 .

[14]  L. Graham,et al.  On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese Model and the American Worker , 1995 .

[15]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[16]  Miriam Erez,et al.  The Congruence of Goal-Setting Strategies With Socio-Cultural Values and its Effect on Performance , 1986 .

[17]  B. Klein Transaction Cost Determinants of "Unfair" Contractual Arrangements , 1980 .

[18]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Creating Lean Suppliers: Diffusing Lean Production through the Supply Chain , 1997 .

[19]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[20]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[21]  W. Ouchi,et al.  JAPANESE-STYLE PARTNERSHIPS -- GIVING COMPANIES A COMPETITIVE EDGE. , 1993 .

[22]  S. Mark Young,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL ADOPTION AND PERFORMANCE OF JAPANESE MANUFACTURING PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1992 .

[23]  Gregory M. Saltzman Job Applicant Screening by a Japanese Transplant: A Union-Avoidance Tactic , 1995 .

[24]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .