Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil

In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  W. Edelstein,et al.  A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems. , 1984, Medical physics.

[2]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[3]  L. Axel,et al.  Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. , 1990, Medical physics.

[4]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  N J Pelc,et al.  Unaliasing by Fourier‐encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Edelman,et al.  Accelerated cardiac imaging using the SMASH technique. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle: characterization with tagged MR imaging. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  F H Epstein,et al.  Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE) † , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Specific coil design for SENSE: A six‐element cardiac array , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Single breath-hold real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm , 2003, European Radiology.

[13]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio for parallel MRI: Electromagnetic field considerations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Manojkumar Saranathan,et al.  Large field‐of‐view real‐time MRI with a 32‐channel system , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength—An experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly parallel volumetric imaging with a 32‐element RF coil array , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.