Fetal Cardiac US: Techniques and Normal Anatomy Correlated with Adult CT and MR Imaging.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is an important cause of childhood mortality. Despite the widespread use of ultrasonography (US) as a screening tool, the prenatal detection rate is suboptimal. Improvement of the initial screening examination, which is performed in low-risk populations and often interpreted by community radiologists, targets a point in the screening process that is likely to have the largest population effect. If the goal of community-based screenings is to detect cases that may be abnormal and refer those to specialized centers for complete assessment, it is logical to use a checklist to confirm normal anatomy. This article presents a stepwise process to evaluate fetal cardiac anatomy using comparison with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images, which are more familiar to radiologists in busy general practices. In addition, this article presents a checklist for assessment of the four-chamber view and demonstrates the expected normal appearance of the outflow tract views as well as the additional views required for complex obstetric US. These additional views include the aortic arch and bicaval views, three-vessel view (3VV), and three-vessel trachea view (3TV). CHD may be isolated, but it may indicate aneuploidy or a syndrome that, if present, determines the prognosis. In isolated CHD, the prognosis is determined by the exact nature of the abnormalities. In particular, duct-dependent disease if undiagnosed results in circulatory collapse in the infant once the ductus closes. If the heart does not look normal, the patient should be referred for detailed evaluation. Timely diagnosis of significant CHD allows for development of a personalized pregnancy management plan. © RSNA, 2017.

[1]  R. Chaoui,et al.  A Review of Findings in Fetal Cardiac Section Drawings , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  A. Abuhamad,et al.  Defining the fetal cardiac axis between 11 + 0 and 14 + 6 weeks of gestation: experience with 100 consecutive pregnancies , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  N. Khoo,et al.  Effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects in South Australia: A population analysis 1999–2003 , 2008, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[4]  D. Levine,et al.  Consensus Report on the Detailed Fetal Anatomic Ultrasound Examination , 2014, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  D Paladini,et al.  ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  N. Silverman,et al.  Improved Surgical Outcome After Fetal Diagnosis of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome , 2001, Circulation.

[7]  L. Pauliks The effect of pregestational diabetes on fetal heart function , 2015, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[8]  L. Allan,et al.  Normal fetal cardiac measurements derived by cross‐sectional echocardiography , 1992, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  S. Yoo,et al.  Abnormal three-vessel view on sonography: a clue to the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the fetus. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Deborah Levine,et al.  Fetal Imaging , 2014, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  David A. Miller,et al.  Outcomes of critical congenital heart disease requiring emergent neonatal cardiac intervention , 2014, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  J. Bland,et al.  Assessment of the intraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracic ratio using ellipse and diameter methods , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  R. Chaoui,et al.  The four‐chamber view: four reasons why it seems to fail in screening for cardiac abnormalities and suggestions to improve detection rate , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  D Paladini,et al.  Pulmonary stenosis and atresia with intact ventricular septum during prenatal life , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  U. Gembruch,et al.  The area behind the heart in the four‐chamber view and the quest for congenital heart defects , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  R. Chaoui,et al.  Fetal Cardiac Axis and Congenital Heart Defects in Early Gestation , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  H. Keenan,et al.  Barriers to prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: a population‐based study , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  M. Sklansky Current guidelines for fetal echocardiography: time to raise the bar. , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[19]  M. Goske,et al.  Situs revisited: imaging of the heterotaxy syndrome. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  N. Silverman,et al.  Costs of prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  A. Kim,et al.  Three‐vessel view of the fetal upper mediastinum: an easy means of detecting abnormalities of the ventricular outflow tracts and great arteries during obstetric screening , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[22]  N. Silverman,et al.  Prenatal Findings in Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return , 2014, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[23]  Dolores H. Pretorius,et al.  AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine.

[24]  D. Pretorius,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Sonographic Cine Imaging Improves Confidence in the Initial Evaluation of the Fetal Heart , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  L. Garel,et al.  Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population: General Concepts, Guidelines, Differential Diagnoses , 2013, Ultrasound quarterly.

[26]  J. Rychik,et al.  Left ventricle to right ventricle size discrepancy in the fetus: the presence of critical congenital heart disease can be reliably predicted. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[27]  E. Garne,et al.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of associated congenital heart diseases by fetal ultrasonographic examination in Europe , 2001, Prenatal diagnosis.

[28]  W. Gersony,et al.  The Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease on Neonatal Outcomes , 2010, Pediatric Cardiology.