Exploration of Healthcare Information System Users' lifeworld: an Empirical Study Informed by Heidegger's phenomenology

As information technology (IT) and information systems (IS) have become increasingly important in healthcare sector, researches have shown that the healthcare context is highly complex and the users in this context have many unique characteristics as compared to those in business contexts. These findings are scattered in the existing healthcare information systems (HIS) studies as “challenges” to and “deviations” from the classic IS acceptance theories; a holistic understanding of the HIS user’s lifeworld is yet to be achieved. Aimed at filling this gap, we conducted an empirical research in the clinical context informed by Heidegger’s phenomenology. Our purpose was to achieve a holistic understanding of the clinical users’ lifeworld and how they make sense of their encounters with HIS. Arguing against the Cartesian tradition in IS research, we developed an existential framework of IS users based on Heidegger’s concept of “Being-in-the-world” and used this framework as a conceptual instrument to inform our research design. By phenomenologically analysing the interview data with four doctors, we have illustrated how this existential framework can enable a holistic understanding of IS users’ lifeworld and their sense-making of their experiences with IS. We hope our exploratory work can inspire more empirical Heideggerian IS research endeavours.

[1]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Methodological and Topic Trends in Information Systems Research: A Meta-Analysis of IS Journals , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  IT Adoption and Evaluation in Healthcare: Evolutions and Insights in Theory, Methodology, and Practice , 2009, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[5]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The mind or the heart? it depends on the (definition of) situation , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Artifact or Equipment? Rethinking the Core of IS using Heidegger's ways of being , 2011, ICIS.

[7]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[8]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' Resistance toward Healthcare Information Technologies: A Dual-Factor Model , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[9]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[10]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[11]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  Health information systems - past, present, future , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology at Work in Arabian Culture: A Model Comparison Approach , 2017 .

[13]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  Hospitality, improvisation and Gestell: a phenomenology of mobile information , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[17]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  The ontological screening of contemporary life: a phenomenological analysis of screens , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Rethinking the place of the artefact in IS using Heidegger's analysis of equipment , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Guest editorial: qualitative studies in information systems: a critical review and some guiding principles , 2013 .

[23]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[24]  Zining Guo,et al.  A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of KM Research: 2000 to 2004 , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[25]  Tina Blegind Jensen,et al.  Hospitality and hostility in hospitals: a case study of an EPR adoption among surgeons , 2007 .

[26]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  Exploring Storytelling as a Knowledge Transfer Technique in Offshore Outsourcing , 2014, ICIS.

[28]  Anne Miller,et al.  Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[31]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  M. Manen Phenomenology of Practice , 2007, Phenomenology & Practice.

[33]  John Mingers,et al.  Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  Healthcare information systems research, revelations and visions , 2007 .

[35]  Meredith Lawley,et al.  Factors influencing decision support system acceptance , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[37]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Tom Butler,et al.  Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Lisa Abrams,et al.  Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Information systems development as situated socio-technical change: a process approach , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[42]  William D. Blattner Heidegger's 'Being and Time': A Reader's Guide , 2007 .

[43]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[44]  John Mingers,et al.  Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[45]  Anita Krabbel,et al.  Participation of Heterogeneous User Groups: Providing an Integrated Hospital Information System , 1996 .

[46]  Zhiping Walter,et al.  Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Mark Brogan Research Methods: Information, Systems and Contexts , 2013 .

[49]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[50]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..