Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams.

The idea that productivity regulates species diversity is deeply ingrained in the field of ecology. Yet, over the past few decades, an increasing number of experiments have shown that species diversity controls, rather than simply responds to, biomass production. These contrasting perspectives have led to a seeming paradox: Is diversity the cause or the consequence of biological production? Here we present empirical evidence for the multivariate productivity-diversity (MPD) hypothesis, which argues that differing perspectives on productivity-diversity relationships can be resolved by recognizing that historical research has focused on how resource supply regulates both the productivity and richness of local competitors, whereas more recent studies have focused on how the richness of a colonist pool regulates the efficiency by which resources are captured and converted into new tissue. The MPD hypothesis predicts that three pathways operate concurrently to generate productivity diversity relationships in nature: (1) resource supply directly limits the standing biomass and/or rate of new production by primary producers, (2) producer biomass is directly influenced by the richness of species that locally compete for resources, and (3) resource supply rate indirectly affects producer biomass by influencing the fraction of species from a colonist pool that locally coexist. To examine whether this set of pathways explains covariation between productivity and diversity in natural streams, we used nutrient-diffusing agar "patches" to manipulate resource supply rates in 20 streams throughout the Sierra Nevada mountain range, California, USA. We then measured the fraction of periphyton species from the stream colonist pool co-occurring on each nutrient patch, as well as the standing biomass and rates of primary production. Natural patterns of covariation agreed with predictions of the MPD hypothesis. Algal biomass was an increasing function of nutrient supply, and an increasing function of local richness. The fraction of species from the colonist pool found co-occurring on a patch was a concave-down function of nutrient supply, causing nutrients to indirectly affect biomass via control over local richness. These results suggest that the MPD hypothesis is a viable explanation of patterns of diversity and productivity in natural stream ecosystems, and that it has potential to merge the historical view that productivity drives diversity with a parallel view that diversity drives productivity.

[1]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User''s Guide to Path Analysis , 2016 .

[2]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Effects of grazer immigration and nutrient enrichment on an open algae-grazer system , 2005 .

[3]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference , 2004 .

[4]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[5]  G. Polis,et al.  TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE AND FOOD WEB ECOLOGY : The Dynamics of Spatially Subsidized Food Webs , 2005 .

[6]  J. Ryther,et al.  Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Eutrophication in the Coastal Marine Environment , 1971, Science.

[7]  Serhiy Morozov,et al.  A Distributed, Architecture-Centric Approach to Computing Accurate Recommendations from Very Large and Sparse Datasets , 2011 .

[8]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[10]  K. Gross,et al.  Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities , 2000 .

[11]  J. Lawton,et al.  Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems , 1994, Nature.

[12]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Connectivity, scale‐dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship , 2004 .

[13]  J. Melack,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment on algal biomass across a natural light gradient , 2005 .

[14]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[15]  David Tilman,et al.  Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[16]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[17]  C. Körner,et al.  A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 and plant species diversity on ecosystem‐level gas exchange in a planted calcareous grassland , 1999 .

[18]  SPATIAL VARIATION OF NUTRIENT BALANCE IN THE TRUCKEE RIVER, CALIFORNIA‐NEVADA 1 , 2006 .

[19]  John Vandermeer,et al.  The Ecology of Intercropping by John H. Vandermeer , 1989 .

[20]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[21]  James B. Grace,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems , 2006 .

[22]  Dennis P. Swaney,et al.  Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences , 1996 .

[23]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species , 1981 .

[24]  Ian T. Carroll,et al.  Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[26]  A. Ives,et al.  Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[27]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[28]  J. Bruno,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Marine Biodiversity on Communities and Ecosystems , 2007 .

[29]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  CYCLIC ASSEMBLY TRAJECTORIES AND SCALE‐DEPENDENT PRODUCTIVITY–DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIPS , 2004 .

[30]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[31]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[32]  Walter K. Dodds,et al.  Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams , 2005 .

[33]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  ECOSYSTEM CONSEQUENCES OF BIODIVERSITY LOSS: THE EVOLUTION OF A PARADIGM , 2002 .

[34]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[35]  K Roy,et al.  Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  P. Abrams Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients : what does competition theory predict? , 1995 .

[37]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[39]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction, Substitution, and Ecosystem Services , 1983 .

[40]  D. Currie Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[41]  James B. Grace,et al.  The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment , 1999 .

[42]  M. Leibold Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities , 1999 .

[43]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen yields from undisturbed watersheds in the Americas , 1999 .

[44]  K. Gross,et al.  Does Species Richness Drive Community Production or Vice Versa? Reconciling Historical and Contemporary Paradigms in Competitive Communities , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[45]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[46]  S. Francoeur Meta-analysis of lotic nutrient amendment experiments: detecting and quantifying subtle responses , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[47]  T. Sørensen,et al.  A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons , 1948 .

[48]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[49]  James B Grace,et al.  Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? , 2007, Ecology letters.

[50]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[51]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning , 2003 .

[52]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[53]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[54]  M. Willig,et al.  Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities , 2000 .

[55]  B. Worm,et al.  Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs , 2003 .

[56]  J. Stoddard,et al.  Regional analysis of inorganic nitrogen yield and retention in high-elevation ecosystems of the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains , 2002 .

[57]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2005 .

[58]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[59]  Jason D. Fridley,et al.  Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities , 2002, Oecologia.

[60]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[61]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[62]  K. L. Cottingham,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS , 2000 .

[63]  B. Schmid The species richness–productivity controversy , 2002 .

[64]  J. Connell,et al.  The Ecological Regulation of Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[65]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[66]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  How are diversity and productivity related , 1993 .

[67]  J. Fox,et al.  Using the Price Equation to partition the effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystem function. , 2006, Ecology.

[68]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[69]  Bradley J. Cardinale,et al.  Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems , 2006, Nature.