Strategyproof Approximation Mechanisms for Location on Networks

We consider the problem of locating a facility on a network, represented by a graph. A set of strategic agents have different ideal locations for the facility; the cost of an agent is the distance between its ideal location and the facility. A mechanism maps the locations reported by the agents to the location of the facility. Specifically, we are interested in social choice mechanisms that do not utilize payments. We wish to design mechanisms that are strategyproof, in the sense that agents can never benefit by lying, or, even better, group strategyproof, in the sense that a coalition of agents cannot all benefit by lying. At the same time, our mechanisms must provide a small approximation ratio with respect to one of two optimization targets: the social cost or the maximum cost. We give an almost complete characterization of the feasible truthful approximation ratio under both target functions, deterministic and randomized mechanisms, and with respect to different network topologies. Our main results are: We show that a simple randomized mechanism is group strategyproof and gives a tight approximation ratio of 3/2 for the maximum cost when the network is a circle; and we show that no randomized SP mechanism can provide an approximation ratio better than 2-o(1) to the maximum cost even when the network is a tree, thereby matching a trivial upper bound of two.

[1]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic game theory , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[2]  D. Eppstein,et al.  Approximation algorithms for geometric problems , 1996 .

[3]  M. Labb How Bad Can a Voting Location Be * , .

[4]  M. Satterthwaite Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .

[5]  Ron Holzman,et al.  An Axiomatic Approach to Location on Networks , 1990, Math. Oper. Res..

[6]  N. Nisan Introduction to Mechanism Design (for Computer Scientists) , 2007 .

[7]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  Tighter Bounds for Facility Games , 2009, WINE.

[8]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Approximate mechanism design without money , 2009, EC '09.

[9]  R. Vohra,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory: Mechanism Design without Money , 2007 .

[10]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Outcomes of voting and planning: Condorcet, Weber and Rawls locations , 1981 .

[11]  H. Bandelt Networks with condorcet solutions , 1985 .

[12]  Martine Labbé,et al.  Outcomes of voting and planning in single facility location problems , 1985 .

[13]  Michael H. Rothkopf,et al.  Thirteen Reasons Why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Process Is Not Practical , 2007, Oper. Res..

[14]  Rakesh V. Vohra,et al.  Strategy-proof Location on a Network , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[15]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Incentive compatible regression learning , 2008, SODA '08.

[16]  Satish Rao,et al.  Approximation schemes for Euclidean k-medians and related problems , 1998, STOC '98.