Somatosensory discrimination of shape: prediction of success in normal volunteers and parkinsonian patients

Abstract Tactile discrimination of macrogeometric objects in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure represents a complex task including somatosensory and higher-order cognitive processing. The objects for somatosensory discrimination were rectangular parallelepipeds that differed in oblongness only. They were presented in sequential pairs to 12 normal volunteers and 13 parkinsonian patients. Owing to the dichotomy of the task, we calculated estimates of the probability of a correct answer by a binomial approach. The probability of a correct answer could be calculated on the basis of a logistic model ensuring that the probability values lie in the interval [0, 1]. The relationship between the probability of a correct answer and the difference in oblongness of the objects could be described solely by one coefficient determined by logistic regression. This coefficient summarized the effectiveness of the simultaneous and consecutive operations inherent in the task and allowed characterization of performances in groups and individuals.

[1]  Per E. Roland,et al.  Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man , 1987, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  M. Raichle,et al.  Stimulus rate dependence of regional cerebral blood flow in human striate cortex, demonstrated by positron emission tomography. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R J Seitz,et al.  Tactile exploration of shape after subcortical ischaemic infarction studied with PET. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  M. R. DeLong,et al.  Tactile spatial acuity and roughness discrimination: Impairments due to aging and Parkinson's disease , 1997, Neurology.

[5]  K. Leenders,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination of shape in parkinsonians , 1996, NeuroImage.

[6]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Per E. Roland,et al.  Some principles and new methods of tactile stimulation , 1975 .

[8]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  H. Ruff,et al.  Infants' manipulative exploration of objects: Effects of age and object characteristics. , 1984 .

[10]  Y. Agid,et al.  Reduction of cortical dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin and their metabolites in Parkinson's disease , 1983, Brain Research.

[11]  J. Marshall.  THE SKIN SENSES , 1969 .

[12]  C. Marsden,et al.  Disturbance of sequential movements in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Christian Bohm,et al.  Somatosensory Discrimination of Shape: Tactile Exploration and Cerebral Activation , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Temporal movement control in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  J. Gibson.  Observations on active touch. , 1962, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  S. L. Visser,et al.  Disturbed frontal regulation of attention in Parkinson's disease. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  P. Wall.  The sensory and motor role of impulses travelling in the dorsal columns towards cerebral cortex. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  B. Dawson-Saunders,et al.  Basic and Clinical Biostatistics , 1993 .

[21]  R J Seitz,et al.  Deficient cerebral activation pattern in stroke recovery. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[22]  P. Martínez-Martín,et al.  Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale characteristics and structure , 1994, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.