The uses of (digital) literacy

ABSTRACT This article shares research facilitated by a multinational technology provider, converging mobile networked technology (tablets) used across school and home, a technology enhanced community ‘third space’ providing workshops for students aged 6–9 with their parents/carers. The approach taken avoids the instrumental measurement of functional digital literacy competences, but instead seeks to negotiate a more nuanced and complex understanding of the ‘uses of literacy’ [from Hoggart, R. 1957. The Uses of Literacy. London: Pelican] in digital contexts and in a deeply situated, specific local setting. Working with our findings, we later put Amartya Sen’s concept of capability [Sen, A. K. 2005. “Human Rights and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development 6 (2): 151–166; Sen, A. K. 2008. “Capability and Well-Being.” In The Philosophy of Economics, edited by D. M. Hausman, 3rd ed., 270–293. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press] to work on our data in order to provide a discussion on how the digital literacy community might distinguish digital competences as functionings from the ‘uses’ of such competences for a broader range of capabilities.

[1]  Lisa Gray,et al.  Building digital capability , 2018 .

[2]  Graham Brotherton,et al.  Working with Vulnerable Children, Young People and Families , 2013 .

[3]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research , 2013 .

[4]  Sara Pereira.  Why parental media mediation is important , 2015 .

[5]  Glynda Hull,et al.  Mobile Texts and Migrant Audiences: Rethinking Literacy and Assessment in a New Media Age , 2009 .

[6]  R. Howard.  The Economic Impact , 1982 .

[7]  J. McDougall,et al.  Digital Literacy and Education in the UK: COST Action IS1401- Strengthening Europeans’ Capabilities by Establishing the European Literacy Network. , 2017 .

[8]  Amartya Sen.  Human Rights and Capabilities , 2005 .

[9]  John Potter,et al.  Digital Media, Culture and Education , 2017 .

[10]  L. Vasudevan,et al.  Cosmopolitan Literacies of Belonging in an After‐school Program With Court‐Involved Youths , 2014 .

[11]  JuliAnna Vila,et al.  Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges , 2012 .

[12]  Mercury Insights,et al.  Mapping of media literacy practices and actions in EU-28 , 2016 .

[13]  David Buckingham,et al.  Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture , 2003 .

[14]  Southern Cross University,et al.  Exploring the complementarities between complexity and action research : the story of Technology Together , 2017 .

[15]  Anne Mette Thorhauge,et al.  The Media and the Mundane : Communication Across Media in Everyday Life , 2016 .

[16]  E. Moje,et al.  Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse , 2004 .

[17]  John Potter,et al.  Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship , 2012 .

[18]  K. Lewin,et al.  The Action Research Planner , 2003 .

[19]  James Paul Gee,et al.  How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit , 2014 .

[20]  Kris D. Gutiérrez.  Developing a Sociocritical Literacy in the Third Space , 2008 .

[21]  Bjorn Nansen,et al.  Postdigital Literacies: Materiality, Mobility and the Aesthetics of Recruitment , 2016 .

[22]  J. McDougall,et al.  Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies , 2017 .

[23]  B. Street.  What's 'new' in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice , 2003 .

[24]  M. G. Stork.  Is technology good for education?, by Neil Selwyn, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Polity Press, 2016, 160 pp., $45.00 (hardcover), ISBN-13: 978-0-74-569646-1 , 2017 .

[25]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[26]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Literacy in the New Media Age , 2003 .

[27]  J. Potter.  Digital Media and Learner Identity , 2012 .

[28]  Cathy Burnett,et al.  Investigating pupils’ interactions around digital texts: a spatial perspective on the “classroom-ness” of digital literacy practices in schools , 2014 .

[29]  Homi K. Bhabha.  The Location of Culture , 1994 .

[30]  Annette Vee.  THE USES OF LITERACY , 2012 .

[31]  Lorella Terzi,et al.  Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs , 2005 .

[32]  D. Yamada-Rice.  New media, evolving multimodal literacy practices and the potential impact of increased use of the visual mode in the urban environment on young children's learning , 2011 .

[33]  J. Potter,et al.  ‘Finger flowment’ and moving image language: learning filmmaking with table devices , 2017 .

[34]  B. Norwich.  How Does the Capability Approach Address Current Issues in Special Educational Needs, Disability and Inclusive Education Field?. , 2014 .

[35]  S. Livingstone,et al.  The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age , 2016 .

[36]  A. Sen,et al.  Capability and Well-Being , 1991 .