An effective application of 3D cloud printing service quality evaluation in BM‐MOPSO

Addressing service control factors, rapid manufacturing environment change, difficulty of resource allocation evaluation, resource optimization of 3D cloud printing service in a cloud manufacturing environment, and other characteristics, this paper proposes an evaluation indicator system of innovative new product development 3D printing order task execution. The evaluation indicator has eight dimensional components, including Time (T), Quality of Service (Q), Matching (Mat), Reliability (R), Flexibility (Flex), Cost (C), Fault tolerance (Ft), and Satisfaction (Sa). It constructs a type of optimal selection model based on a Multi‐Agent 3D Cloud Printing Service Quality Evaluation and a framework of cloud service evaluation of an AHP‐TOPSIS evaluation model based on Pareto optimization, and it designs an algorithm involving hybrid multi‐objective particle swarm optimization (PSO) based on the Baldwin Effect Model. In addition, this paper verifies the effectiveness of the algorithm through an example and offers a case study designed to test its feasibility and effectiveness.

[1]  Fei Tao,et al.  Complex networks based manufacturing service and task management in cloud environment , 2015, 2015 IEEE 10th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA).

[2]  Fei Tao,et al.  Big Data in product lifecycle management , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[3]  Roger C. Wiens,et al.  The potassic sedimentary rocks in Gale Crater, Mars, as seen by ChemCam on board Curiosity , 2016 .

[4]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printed Products in a Distributed Manufacturing System , 2017 .

[5]  Youngjung Geum,et al.  Development of the scenario-based technology roadmap considering layer heterogeneity: An approach using CIA and AHP , 2017 .

[6]  Karim Mokrani,et al.  Improved Fuzzy C-Means based Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) initialization and outlier rejection with level set methods for MR brain image segmentation , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  Jiucheng Xu,et al.  Towards a distributed multi-agent framework for shared resources scheduling , 2014, J. Intell. Manuf..

[8]  A. V. Morozhenko,et al.  On the possibility of determining the imaginary part of the complex refractive index of aerosol particles in an individual altitudinal cloud layer of Jupiter’s atmosphere , 2016 .

[9]  Ma Wen-lon Cloud service selection model based on QoS-aware in cloud manufacturing environment , 2014 .

[10]  Dong Yuan-f Evaluation and selection approach for cloud manufacturing service based on template and global trust degree , 2014 .

[11]  Octavian Morariu,et al.  Service Oriented Mechanisms for Smart Resource Allocation in Private Manufacturing Clouds , 2016, IESS.

[12]  Amit Dhurandhar,et al.  Continuous prediction of manufacturing performance throughout the production lifecycle , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  Sergio Segura,et al.  Evolutionary composition of QoS-aware web services: A many-objective perspective , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Arul Siromoney,et al.  Priority Based Yield of Shared Cache to Provide Cache QoS in Multicore Systems , 2017, International Journal of Parallel Programming.

[15]  Moawia Alghalith Recent applications of theory of the firm under uncertainty , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Ahmed Chiheb Ammari,et al.  An effective and distributed particle swarm optimization algorithm for flexible job-shop scheduling problem , 2015, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[17]  Fei Tao,et al.  Correlation-aware resource service composition and optimal-selection in manufacturing grid , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Integrated Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: A case study , 2014 .

[19]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Common intelligent semantic matching engines of cloud manufacturing service based on OWL-S , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[20]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends , 2015, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[21]  Irraivan Elamvazuthi,et al.  Advanced Pareto Front Non-Dominated Sorting Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation , 2016 .

[22]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India , 2012 .

[23]  Zhifeng Liu,et al.  Application of cloud computing to simulation of a heavy-duty machine tool , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[24]  Dazhe Zhao,et al.  Manufacturing Grid: Needs, Concept, and Architecture , 2003, GCC.

[25]  Kong-Chor Ng,et al.  A 3D Content Cloud: Sharing, Trading and Customizing 3D Print-Ready Objects , 2016, 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM).

[26]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Huimin Liu,et al.  Common engines of cloud manufacturing service platform for SMEs , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[28]  Sun Jin-bo Assessment and selection for service regulation in cloud computing environment , 2012 .

[29]  Nicole Riemer,et al.  A conceptual framework for mixing structures in individual aerosol particles , 2016 .

[30]  Jingeng Mai,et al.  3D printing process selection model based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers in cloud manufacturing , 2017, Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput..

[31]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..