Managerial Foresight and Attempted Rent Appropriation: Insider Trading on Knowledge of Imminent Breakthroughs

In order to establish a competitive advantage, firms must acquire or create resources at a price below their value in use. Absent pure luck, this requires managers to exercise foresight about a resource’s future value and/or complementarities with pre-existing capabilities. This foresight grants managers the opportunity to exploit information asymmetries for personal gain as well as building organizational capabilities. Nevertheless, there is limited research on the extent of foresight or how managers use it. In our study of insider trading, we found that managers purchase stock well before breakthrough patents are filed. We argue for further research on the extent of managerial foresight and how it affects rent generation and appropriation.

[1]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[2]  R. Coff.  When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[4]  H. Nejat Seyhun,et al.  Overreaction or Fundamentals: Some Lessons from Insiders' Response to the Market Crash of 1987 , 1990 .

[5]  H. Ernst.  Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level , 2001 .

[6]  H. Nejat Seyhun,et al.  Insiders' profits, costs of trading, and market efficiency , 1986 .

[7]  D. Teece,et al.  Strategic management and economics , 1991 .

[8]  Terri L. Moore,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 2001, Technometrics.

[9]  Bin Ke,et al.  What Insiders Know About Future Earnings and How They Use it: Evidence from Insider Trades , 2002 .

[10]  Larry H. P. Lang,et al.  Insider Trading around Dividend Announcements: Theory and Evidence , 1991 .

[11]  Francis Narin,et al.  Technological performance assessments based on patents and patent citations , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Jonathan M. Karpoff,et al.  Insider Trading Before New Issue Announcements , 1991 .

[13]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF UNOBSERVABLES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[14]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[16]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[17]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[18]  Peggy M. Lee.  What's in a name.com?: The effects of ‘.com’ name changes on stock prices and trading activity , 2001 .

[19]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[20]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[21]  J. Barney.  Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment , 1989 .

[22]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[23]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Managerial and windfall rents in the market for corporate control , 1992 .

[24]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[25]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[26]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[27]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[28]  Rodolphe Durand.  Predicting a firm's forecasting ability: The roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention , 2003 .

[29]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[30]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[31]  Elaine Mosakowski,et al.  Strategy Making Under Causal Ambiguity: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Evidence , 1997 .

[32]  John Roberts,et al.  Uncertain Imitability : An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 2007 .

[33]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[34]  A. Damodaran,et al.  Insider Trading as a Signal of Private Information , 1993 .

[35]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[36]  R. Coff,et al.  Bidding Wars Over R&D Intensive Firms: Knowledge, Opportunism and the Market for Corporate Control , 2003 .

[37]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example (2nd ed.). , 1992 .

[38]  Insider Trading as a Vehicle to Appropriate Rent from R&D , 2003 .

[39]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[40]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[41]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[42]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1976 .

[43]  H. N. Seyhun,et al.  Why Does Aggregate Insider Trading Predict Future Stock Returns , 1992 .

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[45]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[46]  J. Barney.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[47]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[48]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .