Reduction of absorbed dose in storage phosphor urography by significant lowering of tube voltage and adjustment of image display parameters

Purpose: To investigate whether image quality in storage phosphor urography can be maintained when the X‐ray tube voltage is significantly lowered to give a lower patient dose. Material and Methods: Initial phantom studies were used to establish exposure settings at 53 kV that gave signal‐to‐noise ratios for contrast media structures equivalent to those obtained at the reference kilovoltage of 69 kV. Dose area product and image quality, assessed by image quality criteria and visual grading, were then recorded for 44 patients drawn at random to be examined by either the standard or modified technique. Results: Absorbed dose could be reduced by more than 30% without any significant change in image quality in manually controlled exposures and by 13% in exposures controlled by AEC. Conclusion: It might be possible to lower the tube voltage in digital examinations involving contrast media as a means of lowering patient dose. The image display parameters need to be adjusted to maintain image quality.

[1]  D R Dance,et al.  Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  B. Lindskoug,et al.  The Reference Man in diagnostic radiology dosimetry. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  W Huda,et al.  Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  J. Persliden,et al.  Energy imparted to the patient in diagnostic radiology: calculation of conversion factors for determining the energy imparted from measurements of the air collision kerma integrated over beam area. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D R Dance,et al.  A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  M Zankl,et al.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  C E Ravin,et al.  Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  Á. Jónsson,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Computed Skeletal Radiography , 1996 .

[10]  B Axelsson,et al.  Digital skeletal radiography: Reduction of absorbed dose by adaptation of exposure factors and image processing , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[11]  N W Marshall Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.