Stretch sensitization of human muscle spindles.

1. Sixty‐seven afferents from the finger extensor muscles were consecutively recorded by microneurography. 2. The units were classified as primary or secondary muscle spindle afferents or Golgi tendon organ afferents on the basis of their responses to ramp‐and‐hold stretches, sinusoidals superimposed on ramp‐and‐hold stretches, maximal twitch contractions and isometric contractions and relaxations. 3. The muscle was repeatedly stretched and then either kept short or long for a few seconds followed by a slow ramp stretch. The responses of the muscle afferents to the slow stretch were compared under the two conditions. 4. Thirty out of thirty‐eight units classified as primary spindle afferents and four out of eleven units classified as secondary afferents showed an enhanced response to the slow ramp when the muscle had been kept short compared to the response when the muscle had been kept long. 5. None of the eighteen Golgi tendon organ afferents showed any difference in this respect. 6. It is concluded that stretch sensitization does occur in human muscle spindles and, when present, constitutes firm evidence of the afferent originating from a muscle spindle rather than a Golgi tendon organ. In addition, due to differences in the response characteristics of primaries and secondaries, the test may aid in separating muscle spindle primary afferents from secondary afferents.

[1]  U. Proske,et al.  The time-course of recovery of the initial burst of primary endings of muscle spindles , 1977, Brain Research.

[2]  F. Emonet-Dénand,et al.  Effects of stretch on dynamic fusimotor after‐effects in cat muscle spindles. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[4]  U Proske,et al.  Aftereffects in the responses of cat muscle spindles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  Further study of efferent small‐nerve fibres to mammalian muscle spindles. Multiple spindle innervation and activity during contraction , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Responses of muscle spindles to stretch after a period of fusimotor activity compared in freely moving and anaesthetized cats , 1977, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Åke Vallbo,et al.  Basic patterns of muscle spindle discharge in man , 1981 .

[8]  C C Hunt,et al.  Fusimotor after‐effects on responses of primary endings to test dynamic stimuli in cat muscle spindles. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M Nordin,et al.  Thixotropic behaviour of human finger flexor muscles with accompanying changes in spindle and reflex responses to stretch. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. K. Hill,et al.  Tension due to interaction between the sliding filaments in resting striated muscle. the effect of stimulation , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  A B Vallbo,et al.  Twitch contraction for identification of human muscle afferents. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  D. Barker The innervation of the muscle-spindle. , 1948, The Quarterly journal of microscopical science.

[13]  M. Hulliger,et al.  The absence of position response in spindle afferent units from human finger muscles during accurate position holding. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  P. Matthews,et al.  After‐effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R E Poppele,et al.  Stretch-induced contraction of intrafusal muscle in cat muscle spindle , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Prochazka,et al.  The after‐effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.