Enhanced evoked response amplitudes in the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla following acoustic trauma

Evoked response amplitude-level functions were measured from electrodes in the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla before and after exposure to a 2 kHz pure tone of 105 dB SPL. The exposure produced approximately 20-30 dB of permanent threshold shift from 2 to 8 kHz, but little or no hearing loss at higher or lower frequencies. Generally less than 60% of the outer hair cells were missing in the region of hearing loss. The amplitude-level functions measured at 4 and 8 kHz generally showed a loss in sensitivity at low sound levels, a reduction in the maximum amplitude and sometimes steeper than normal slopes. The amplitude-level functions measured at 2 kHz also showed a loss in sensitivity; however, the maximum amplitude was often greater than normal. Even though there was no loss in sensitivity at 0.5 kHz, the amplitude-level function was steeper than normal and the maximum amplitude of the evoked response was almost always substantially larger than normal. The enhancement of the evoked response amplitude from the inferior colliculus does not appear to originate in the cochlea, but may reflect a reorganization of neural activity in the central auditory pathway.

[1]  J. G. Hall The cochlear nuclei in monkeys after dihydrostreptomycin or noise exposure. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  Theopold Hm Degenerative alterations in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig after impulse noise exposure. A preliminary light and electron microscopic study. , 1975 .

[3]  J. Willott,et al.  Noise-induced hearing loss can alter neural coding and increase excitability in the central nervous system. , 1982, Science.

[4]  J. Kaas,et al.  Reorganization of mammalian somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve injury , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  K. Henry,et al.  Recruitment deafness: functional effect of priming-induced audiogenic seizures in mice. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  Excitability of auditory neurons in the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei of DBA 2 and , 1984, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  J. D. Miller,et al.  A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Salvi,et al.  Evoked-response forward-masking functions in chinchillas with noise-induced permanent hearing loss. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Neural correlates of auditory fatigue: frequency-dependent changes in activity of single cochlear nerve fibers. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. P. Hamernik,et al.  Response patterns of auditory nerve fibers during temporary threshold shift , 1983, Hearing Research.

[11]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts , 1983, Hearing Research.

[12]  J. Saunders,et al.  Cochlear nucleus activity and temporary threshold shift in cat. , 1970, Brain research.

[13]  R. Salvi,et al.  Evoked‐response audibility curve of the chinchilla , 1973 .

[14]  R. Salvi,et al.  Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[15]  J. Mills,et al.  Anatomical, behavioral, and electrophysiological observations on chinchillas after long exposures to noise. , 1973, Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[16]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Immediate and chronic changes in responses of somatosensory cortex in adult flying-fox after digit amputation , 1988, Nature.

[17]  J. Metzler,et al.  Functional changes in cat somatic sensory-motor cortex during short-term reversible epidural blocks , 1979, Brain Research.

[18]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Structure-Function Correlation in Noise-Damaged Ears: A Light and Electron-Microscopic Study , 1986 .

[19]  G. Lidén,et al.  Audiological and morphological assessment of effect of noise on cochlea and brain stem in cat. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. , 1987, Progress in brain research.

[21]  R. Rajan,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization , 1990, Brain Research.

[22]  John J. Guinan,et al.  Efferent innervation of the organ of corti: two separate systems , 1979, Brain Research.

[23]  J. Saunders,et al.  Effects of priming for audiogenic seizure on auditory evoked responses in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus of BALB-c mice. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[24]  Effects of moderately intense sound on auditory sensitivity in rhesus monkeys: behavioral and neural observations. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. M. Gerken,et al.  Increase in Central Auditory Responsiveness During Continuous Tone Stimulation or Following Hearing Loss , 1986 .

[26]  A. J. Klein,et al.  Physiological (waves I and V) and psychophysical tuning curves in human subjects. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  D. N. Elliott,et al.  Effects of intense auditory stimulation: hearing losses and inner ear changes in the squirrel monkey. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Livingston,et al.  Long-lasting nervous system responses to prolonged sound stimulation in waking cats. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Schuknecht Hf,et al.  Stimulation deafness: a study of hearing losses resulting from exposure to noise or to blast impulses. , 1954 .

[31]  Joel Ira Franck,et al.  Functional reorganization of cat somatic sensory-motor cortex (SmI) after selective dorsal root rhizotomies , 1980, Brain Research.

[32]  P. Dallos,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves and auditory thresholds after hair cell damage in the chinchilla. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. Gates,et al.  The effects of priming for audiogenic seizures on cochlear and behavioral responses in BALB-c mice. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[34]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two-tone inhibition, and responses to trapezoidal-wave patterns. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  G. M. Gerken,et al.  Hypersensitivity to electrical stimulation of auditory nuclei follows hearing loss in cats , 1984, Hearing Research.

[36]  A Ryan,et al.  Noise-induced threshold shift and cochlear pathology in the Mongolian gerbil. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Cochlear biomechanics: Vulnerability to acoustic trauma and other alterations as seen in neural responses and ear-canal sound pressure , 1982 .

[38]  D. Rasmusson,et al.  Reorganization of raccoon somatosensory cortex following removal of the fifth digit , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.