Modelling osmotic stress by Flux Balance Analysis at the genomic scale.

Predictive microbiology for food safety is still primarily based on empirical models describing the effect of the environmental conditions of the food on the kinetics of the growth of foodborne pathogens. One way to make these models more mechanistic is to use systems biology methods such as Flux Balance Analysis (FBA). FBA consists of evaluating the possible fluxes through the metabolic reactions taking place in a cell. Using this method, the specific growth rate of Escherichia coli can be predicted by assuming, as an objective function, that the cells maximise their biomass production during balanced growth. Whilst this works under favourable environmental conditions, our simulations show that this objective function is not sufficient to explain the decrease of the growth rate due to osmotic stress. One feature of the FBA models is that the parameters and objective function in general refer to chemostat experiments where the carbon source is the main limiting factor. This may be relevant to some foods where the carbon to nitrogen balance is limiting but, in general, it is the physico-chemical conditions which are the most stringent. We therefore need to examine the effect of such constraints on the fluxes and/or modify the objective function, or to elaborate the metabolic model by taking into account other functional levels of the cell in order to develop mechanistic predictive models for osmotic stress conditions.

[1]  M. Record,et al.  Accumulation of 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonate by osmotically stressed Escherichia coli K-12 , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Tomohiko Ikeuchi,et al.  Effect of compatible solutes on the respiratory activity and growth of Escherichia coli K-12 under NaCl stress. , 2002, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[3]  A. Strøm,et al.  Choline-glycine betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance in Escherichia coli , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  Desmond S. Lun,et al.  Interpreting Expression Data with Metabolic Flux Models: Predicting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mycolic Acid Production , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  T. Hwa,et al.  Interdependence of Cell Growth and Gene Expression: Origins and Consequences , 2010, Science.

[6]  J. Cairney,et al.  Salmonella typhimurium proP gene encodes a transport system for the osmoprotectant betaine , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  J. B. Armstrong,et al.  The effect of salt on phospholipid fatty acid composition in Escherichia coli K-12. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[9]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[12]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  J. Cairney,et al.  Osmoregulation of Gene Expression in Salmonella typhimurium: proU Encodes an Osmotically Induced Betaine Transport System , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  B. Teusink,et al.  Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  H. Jung,et al.  Purification and reconstitution of an osmosensor: transporter ProP of Escherichia coli senses and responds to osmotic shifts. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[16]  I. Booth,et al.  Osmoregulation and its importance to food-borne microorganisms. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[17]  L. Veenhoff,et al.  Molecular sieving properties of the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli and consequences of osmotic stress , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  E. P. Kennedy Osmotic regulation and the biosynthesis of membrane-derived oligosaccharides in Escherichia coli. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Record,et al.  Origins of the osmoprotective properties of betaine and proline in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  R. Titball,et al.  Role of trehalose biosynthesis in environmental survival and virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. , 2002, Research in microbiology.

[21]  J. Selbig,et al.  Metabolomic and transcriptomic stress response of Escherichia coli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  F. Neidhart Escherichia coli and Salmonella. , 1996 .

[23]  Grahame W. Gould,et al.  Mechanisms of action of food preservation procedures. , 1989 .

[24]  I. Booth,et al.  Quantitative analysis of growth stimulation by glycine betaine in Salmonella typhimurium. , 1994, Microbiology.

[25]  B. Palsson,et al.  Constraints-based models: regulation of gene expression reduces the steady-state solution space. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Systems biology and food microbiology , 2007 .

[27]  M. Record,et al.  Roles of cytoplasmic osmolytes, water, and crowding in the response of Escherichia coli to osmotic stress: biophysical basis of osmoprotection by glycine betaine. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[28]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Systems Biology , 1994 .

[29]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  The biomass objective function. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[30]  Irina A. Shkel,et al.  Cytoplasmic Protein Mobility in Osmotically Stressed Escherichia coli , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  József Baranyi,et al.  Lag phase of Salmonella under osmotic stress , 2010 .

[32]  M. Record,et al.  Large changes in cytoplasmic biopolymer concentration with osmolality indicate that macromolecular crowding may regulate protein–DNA interactions and growth rate in osmotically stressed Escherichia coli K‐12 , 2004, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[33]  J. Baranyi,et al.  Lag Phase of Salmonella enterica under Osmotic Stress Conditions , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  M. A. de Menezes,et al.  Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  S. J. Pirt,et al.  Principles of microbe and cell cultivation , 1975 .

[36]  Tom M. Conrad,et al.  Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[37]  T. Ross,et al.  Final optical density and growth rate; effects of temperature and NaCl differ from acidity. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[38]  A. Strøm,et al.  Biochemical and genetic characterization of osmoregulatory trehalose synthesis in Escherichia coli , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  M. Record,et al.  Biophysical characterization of changes in amounts and activity of Escherichia coli cell and compartment water and turgor pressure in response to osmotic stress. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[41]  Tom Ross,et al.  Predictive Microbiology : Theory and Application , 1993 .

[42]  Marcel H. Zwietering,et al.  Modelling microorganisms in food , 2007 .