Multi-criteria ranking and source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Brisbane, Australia

Environmental context. There are serious global concerns about the environmental and health effects of atmospheric air pollutants. However, estimates of pollutants from measurements made in the proximity of a source do not always represent the ultimate atmospheric concentrations. Therefore alternative methods of attributing pollutants to sources, and estimating their contributions to atmospheric concentrations, as demonstrated in the current work, will become an increasingly important area of environmental research. Abstract. This paper reports the application of multicriteria decision making techniques, Preference Ranking Organisation Methods for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) and Graphical Analysis for Interactive Assistance (GAIA), and receptor models, principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) and positive matrix factorisation (PMF), to data from an air monitoring site located on the campus of Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia and operated by Queensland Environmental Protection Agency (QEPA). The data consisted of the concentrations of 21 chemical species and meteorological data collected between 1995 and 2003. PROMETHEE/GAIA separated the samples into those collected when leaded and unleaded petrol were used to power vehicles in the region. The number and source profiles of the factors obtained from PCA/APCS and PMF analyses were compared. There are noticeable differences in the outcomes possibly because of the non-negative constraints imposed on the PMF analysis. Whereas PCA/APCS identified 6 sources, PMF reduced the data to 9 factors. Each factor had distinctive compositions that suggested that motor vehicle emissions, controlled burning of forests, secondary sulfate, sea salt and soil were the most important sources of fine particulate matter at the site. The most plausible locations of the sources were identified by combining the results obtained from the receptor models with meteorological data. The study demonstrated the potential benefits of combining results from multi-criteria decision making analysis with those from receptor models in order to gain insights into information that could enhance the development of air pollution control measures.

[1]  A. Gupta,et al.  Source apportionment of PM10 at residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India , 2007 .

[2]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Estimation of source apportionment and potential source locations of PM2.5 at a west coastal IMPROVE site , 2007 .

[3]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and semi-urban areas in Bangladesh , 2004 .

[4]  Shelly L. Miller,et al.  Source apportionment of exposures to volatile organic compounds. I. Evaluation of receptor models using simulated exposure data , 2002 .

[5]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Application of multicriteria decision making methods to air quality in the microenvironments of residential houses in Brisbane, Australia. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  L. Morawska,et al.  Characterization of elemental and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compositions of urban air in Brisbane , 2005 .

[7]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models , 2003 .

[8]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Trends in size classified particle number concentration in subtropical Brisbane, Australia, based on a 5 year study , 2007 .

[9]  S. Hu,et al.  UNMIX modeling of ambient PM(2.5) near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, OH, USA. , 2006, Atmospheric environment.

[10]  Isobel J. Simpson,et al.  C1–C8 volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Hong Kong: Overview of atmospheric processing and source apportionment , 2007 .

[11]  J. Lewtas,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 at an urban IMPROVE site in Seattle, Washington. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[13]  P. Hopke,et al.  Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: chemical composition and sources. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Source Apportionment: Findings from the U.S. Supersites Program , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  Effect of fuel composition and engine operating conditions on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from a fleet of heavy-duty diesel buses , 2005 .

[16]  L. Herngren,et al.  Analysis of heavy metals in road-deposited sediments. , 2006, Analytica chimica acta.

[17]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Sources of fine particle composition in the northeastern US , 2001 .

[18]  P. Paatero Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis , 1997 .

[19]  Isobel J. Simpson,et al.  Source contributions to ambient VOCs and CO at a rural site in eastern China , 2004 .

[20]  Peter Brimblecombe,et al.  The effects of air pollution on the built environment , 2003 .

[21]  Yasuaki Maeda,et al.  Assessment of the effect of air pollution on material damages in Northeast Asia , 2004 .

[22]  P. Paatero,et al.  Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems , 1993 .

[23]  David D. Cohen,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane (Australia) by receptor modelling , 1999 .

[24]  T. Lange,et al.  The 2003/2004 Libby, Montana PM2.5 Source Apportionment Research Study , 2006 .

[25]  P. Hopke,et al.  Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[26]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Identification of Source Nature and Seasonal Variations of Arctic Aerosol byPositive Matrix Factorization , 1999 .

[27]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Source Apportionment of Daily Fine Particulate Matter at Jefferson Street, Atlanta, GA, during Summer and Winter , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[28]  P. Hopke,et al.  Comparison of Source Apportionments of Fine Particulate Matter at Two San Jose Speciation Trends Network Sites , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[29]  Prakash V. Bhave,et al.  Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[30]  J. Brook,et al.  Identification of the major sources contributing to PM2.5 observed in Toronto. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  C. Chan,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in urban area of Hong Kong. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[32]  Ming-Ho Yu,et al.  Environmental Toxicology: Biological and Health Effects of Pollutants , 2000 .

[33]  Yu Song,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing using principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores and UNMIX. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Sources of fine particle composition in New York city , 2004 .

[35]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Apportioning sources of PM2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data , 2006 .

[36]  David D. Cohen,et al.  IBA methods for characterisation of fine particulate atmospheric pollution: a local, regional and global research problem , 2004 .

[37]  S. Rutherford,et al.  Associations between Outdoor Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions in Brisbane, Australia , 2001, Archives of environmental health.

[38]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[39]  Hai Guo,et al.  Source apportionment of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Hong Kong: application of a principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) receptor model. , 2004, Environmental pollution.