Range-based target localization and pursuit with autonomous vehicles: An approach using posterior CRLB and model predictive control

Abstract We address the general problem of multiple target localization and pursuit using measurements of the ranges from the targets to a set of autonomous pursuing vehicles, referred to as trackers. We develop a general framework for targets with models exhibiting uncertainty in the initial state, process, and measurement noise. The main objective is to compute optimal motions for the trackers that maximize the range-based information available for target localization and at the same time yield good target pursuit performance. The solution proposed is rooted in an estimation-theoretical setting that involves the computation of an appropriately defined Bayesian Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). The inverse of the latter yields a posterior Cramer–Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) on the covariance of the targets’ state estimation errors that can be possibly achieved with any estimator. Using the FIM, sufficient conditions on the trackers’ motions are derived for the ideal relative geometry between the trackers and the targets for which the range information acquired is maximal. This allows for an intuitive understanding of the types of ideal tracker trajectories. To deal with realistic constraints on the trackers’ motions and the requirement that the trackers pursue the targets, we then propose a model predictive control (MPC) framework for optimal tracker motion generation with a view to maximizing the predicted range information for target localization while taking explicitly into account the trackers’ dynamics, strict constraints on the trackers’ states and inputs, and prior knowledge about the targets’ states. The efficacy of the MPC is assessed in simulation through the help of representative examples motivated by operational scenarios involving single and multiple targets and trackers.

[1]  Joaquín del Río,et al.  Optimal path shape for range-only underwater target localization using a Wave Glider , 2018, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear controllability and observability , 1977 .

[3]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[4]  Giovanni Indiveri,et al.  Fixed target 3D localization based on range data only: A recursive least squares approach , 2012 .

[5]  Nikola Miskovic,et al.  Underwater Object Tracking Using Sonar and USBL Measurements , 2016, J. Sensors.

[6]  Otilia Popescu,et al.  Maximizing the determinant for a special class of block-partitioned matrices , 2004 .

[7]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Optimality analysis of sensor-target localization geometries , 2010, Autom..

[8]  Denis Pillon,et al.  Observability: Range-Only Versus Bearings-Only Target Motion Analysis When the Observer Maneuvers Smoothly , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Optimal sensor placement and motion coordination for target tracking , 2006, Autom..

[10]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  António Manuel Santos Pascoal,et al.  Multiple autonomous surface vehicle motion planning for cooperative range-based underwater target localization , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control..

[12]  Mark A. Moline,et al.  Tracking and Following a Tagged Leopard Shark with an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle , 2013, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  Joel Andersson,et al.  A General-Purpose Software Framework for Dynamic Optimization (Een algemene softwareomgeving voor dynamische optimalisatie) , 2013 .

[14]  António Manuel Santos Pascoal,et al.  An Observability Metric for Underwater Vehicle Localization Using Range Measurements , 2013, Sensors.

[15]  Jacopo Aguzzi,et al.  Range-Only Single-Beacon Tracking of Underwater Targets From an Autonomous Vehicle: From Theory to Practice , 2019, IEEE Access.

[16]  Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. Part 1 - Detection, Estimation, and Linear Modulation Theory. , 1968 .

[17]  David Moreno-Salinas,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement for Acoustic Underwater Target Positioning With Range-Only Measurements , 2016, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[18]  James McCarthy,et al.  Target motion analysis using range-only measurements: algorithms, performance and application to ISAR data , 2002, Signal Process..

[19]  António Manuel Santos Pascoal,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement for Multiple Target Positioning with Range-Only Measurements in Two-Dimensional Scenarios , 2013, Sensors.

[20]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[21]  Antonio Pedro Aguiar,et al.  Cooperative path-following control with logic-based communications: theory and practice , 2019, Navigation and Control of Autonomous Marine Vehicles.

[22]  Denis Pillon,et al.  Observability: range-only vs. bearings-only target motion analysis for a leg-by-leg observer's trajectory , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.