Bayesian prediction of mean indoor radon concentrations for Minnesota counties.

Past efforts to identify areas with higher than average indoor radon concentrations by examining the statistical relationship between local mean concentrations and physical parameters such as the soil radium concentration have been hampered by the variation in local means caused by the small number of homes monitored in most areas. In this paper, indoor radon data from a survey in Minnesota are analyzed to minimize the effect of finite sample size within counties, to determine the true county-to-county variation of indoor radon concentrations in the state, and to find the extent to which this variation is explained by the variation in surficial radium concentration among counties. The analysis uses hierarchical modeling, in which some parameters of interest (such as county geometric mean radon concentrations) are assumed to be drawn from a single population, for which the distributional parameters are estimated from the data. Extensions of this technique, known as random effects regression and mixed effects regression, are used to determine the relationship between predictive variables and indoor radon concentrations; the results are used to refine the predictions of each county's radon levels, resulting in a great decrease in uncertainty. The true county-to-county variation of geometric mean radon levels is found to be substantially less than the county-to-county variation of the observed geometric means, much of which is due to the small sample size in each county. The variation in the logarithm of surficial radium content is shown to explain approximately 80% of the variation of the logarithm of geometric mean radon concentration among counties. The influences of housing and measurement factors, such as whether the monitored home has a basement and whether the measurement was made in a basement, are also discussed. The statistical method can be used to predict mean radon concentrations, or applied to other geographically distributed environmental parameters.

[1]  H. Harter,et al.  Iterative maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of normal populations from singly and doubly censored samples. , 1969, Biometrika.

[2]  J. S. Duval,et al.  Equivalent uranium map of conterminous United States , 1989 .

[3]  A. V. Nero,et al.  Statistically Based Methodologies for Mapping of Radon 'Actual' Concentrations: The Case of Minnesota , 1994 .

[4]  A. Van Heuvelen,et al.  Identifying areas with potential for high indoor radon levels: analysis of the national airborne radiometric reconnaissance data for California and the Pacific Northwest , 1984 .

[5]  S A Jackson,et al.  Estimating radon potential from an aerial radiometric survey. , 1992, Health physics.

[6]  W. Nazaroff,et al.  Distribution of airborne radon-222 concentrations in U.S. homes. , 1986, Science.

[7]  C. S. Dudney,et al.  Indoor 222Rn in Tennessee Valley Houses: Seasonal, Building, and Geological Factors , 1992 .

[8]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .

[9]  D. Lindley,et al.  Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model , 1972 .

[10]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Generalized linear models with random e ects: a Gibbs sampling approach , 1991 .

[11]  A. V. Nero,et al.  Mapping Surficial Radium Content as a Partial Indicator of Radon Concentrations in US Houses , 1988 .

[12]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Using Empirical Bayes Techniques in the Law School Validity Studies , 1980 .

[13]  T. Gesell,et al.  Background atmospheric 222Rn concentrations outdoors and indoors: a review. , 1983, Health physics.

[14]  S. B. White,et al.  Indoor 222Rn concentrations in a probability sample of 43,000 houses across 30 states. , 1992, Health physics.

[15]  B. Cohen,et al.  Survey of one-year average Rn levels in Pittsburgh area homes. , 1985, Health physics.

[16]  Nl Nagda,et al.  Radon: Prevalence, Measurements, Health Risks and Control , 1994 .

[17]  S. B. White,et al.  Areas of the United States with elevated screening levels of 222Rn. , 1994, Health physics.

[18]  P N Price,et al.  The regression effect as a cause of the nonlinear relationship between short- and long-term radon concentration measurements. , 1995, Health physics.

[19]  T. Bayes.  An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .