Optimization of propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography for breast cancer imaging

The aim of this study was to optimise the experimental protocol and data analysis for in-vivo breast cancer x-ray imaging. Results are presented of the experiment at the SYRMEP beamline of Elettra Synchrotron using the propagation-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography method, which incorporates not only absorption, but also x-ray phase information. In this study the images of breast tissue samples, of a size corresponding to a full human breast, with radiologically acceptable x-ray doses were obtained, and the degree of improvement of the image quality (from the diagnostic point of view) achievable using propagation-based phase-contrast image acquisition protocols with proper incorporation of x-ray phase retrieval into the reconstruction pipeline was investigated. Parameters such as the x-ray energy, sample-to-detector distance and data processing methods were tested, evaluated and optimized with respect to the estimated diagnostic value using a mastectomy sample with a malignant lesion. The results of quantitative evaluation of images were obtained by means of radiological assessment carried out by 13 experienced specialists. A comparative analysis was performed between the x-ray and the histological images of the specimen. The results of the analysis indicate that, within the investigated range of parameters, both the objective image quality characteristics and the subjective radiological scores of propagation-based phase-contrast images of breast tissues monotonically increase with the strength of phase contrast which in turn is directly proportional to the product of the radiation wavelength and the sample-to-detector distance. The outcomes of this study serve to define the practical imaging conditions and the CT reconstruction procedures appropriate for low-dose phase-contrast mammographic imaging of live patients at specially designed synchrotron beamlines.

[1]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[2]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[3]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Accuracy and precision of reconstruction of complex refractive index in near-field single-distance propagation-based phase-contrast tomography , 2013 .

[4]  Mirko Boin,et al.  Compensation of ring artefacts in synchrotron tomographic images. , 2006, Optics express.

[5]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Breast ultrasonography: state of the art. , 2013, Radiology.

[6]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[7]  A Mittone,et al.  Radiation dose in breast CT imaging with monochromatic x-rays: simulation study of the influence of energy, composition and thickness , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Kentaro Uesugi,et al.  Quantitative and dynamic measurements of biological fresh samples with X-ray phase contrast tomography , 2014, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[9]  S. Wilkins,et al.  Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  Marcus J Kitchen,et al.  A feasibility study of X-ray phase-contrast mammographic tomography at the Imaging and Medical beamline of the Australian Synchrotron. , 2015, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[11]  E Brun,et al.  High-resolution breast tomography at high energy: a feasibility study of phase contrast imaging on a whole breast , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  A general few-projection method for tomographic reconstruction of samples consisting of several distinct materials , 2010 .

[14]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016 .

[15]  C P Lawinski,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[16]  V Fanti,et al.  Towards breast tomography with synchrotron radiation at Elettra: first images , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  S Pacilè,et al.  Clinical application of low-dose phase contrast breast CT: methods for the optimization of the reconstruction workflow. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[18]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Comparison of in vitro breast cancer visibility in analyser-based computed tomography with histopathology, mammography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[19]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Phase-contrast x-ray imaging of the breast: recent developments towards clinics , 2013 .

[20]  H. V. D. Vorst,et al.  SIRT- and CG-type methods for the iterative solution of sparse linear least-squares problems , 1990 .

[21]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography , 2014 .

[22]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  Screening for breast cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[23]  Emmanuel Brun,et al.  High-resolution, low-dose phase contrast X-ray tomography for 3D diagnosis of human breast cancers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Phase-contrast X-ray imaging of breast , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[25]  H M Hertz,et al.  A 24 keV liquid-metal-jet x-ray source for biomedical applications. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[26]  P. C. Diemoz,et al.  Theoretical comparison of three X-ray phase-contrast imaging techniques: propagation-based imaging, analyzer-based imaging and grating interferometry. , 2012, Optics express.

[27]  P C Brennan,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging? , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[28]  Franz Pfeiffer,et al.  Phase-Contrast Hounsfield Units of Fixated and Non-Fixated Soft-Tissue Samples , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Noise propagation in x-ray phase-contrast imaging and computed tomography , 2014 .

[30]  R D Speller,et al.  Low-dose phase contrast mammography with conventional x-ray sources. , 2013, Medical physics.

[31]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[32]  Franz Pfeiffer,et al.  Hard X-ray phase-contrast imaging with the Compact Light Source based on inverse Compton X-rays. , 2009, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[33]  D. Dance.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Roberto Pugliese,et al.  Enhanced and Flexible Software Tools for X-ray Computed Tomography at the Italian Synchrotron Radiation Facility Elettra , 2015, Fundam. Informaticae.

[35]  Kai Yang,et al.  Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Giuliana Tromba,et al.  Duality between noise and spatial resolution in linear systems. , 2014, Optics express.

[37]  Giuliana Tromba,et al.  Phase-Contrast Mammography at the SYRMEP Beamline of Elettra , 2011 .

[38]  Paola Coan,et al.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  P. Cloetens,et al.  Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.